Lily J Jiang

Biographic Data

ID3602355
NAMELily J Jiang
GIVEN NAMESLily J
FAMILY NAMEJiang
SIGNATUREJIANG L J
AFFILIATIONSIndiana University Bloomington
ORCID0000-0002-8769-6535
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS145
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2

  • Evaluation of intimate partner violence screening administration formats in a court-affiliated family mediation program

    Holly Huber Gifford, Lily J Jiang et al.ARTICLEPsychology Public Policy and Law2024

  • Parents reporting partner violence

    Open AccessLily J Jiang, Amy G Applegate et al.ARTICLEConflict Resolution Quarterly2023

    Using data from a study examining forms of mediation designed to be safer for separating parents reporting high levels of intimate partner violence (IPV; Holtzworth‐Munroe, Applegate, et al., 2021; Holtzworth‐Munroe, Beck, et al., 2021), the current study compares three groups, cases that reached mediation agreement (“mediation agreement group”), did not reach mediation agreement and returned to court (“no mediation agreement group”), or went to …

  • Intimate Partner Violence Predicting Outcomes in Specialized Mediation and Traditional Litigation

    Open AccessHolly Huber Gifford, Lily J Jiang et al.ARTICLEJournal of Family Violence2023References: 5

  • Predictors of attendance at court‐referred shuttle or videoconferencing mediation among separating or divorcing parents reporting high levels of intimate partner violence

    Open AccessLily J Jiang, Fernanda S Rossi et al.ARTICLEFamily Court Review2022

    A majority of separating parents seeking family mediation report intimate partner violence (IPV). Whether mediation is appropriate for such parties is controversial. Modified mediation approaches may enhance party safety by keeping them physically separated (e.g., shuttle and videoconferencing mediation). Unfortunately, little research exists regarding whether parties reporting IPV attend mediation, even proposed safer forms, and whether attendan…

  • Intimate partner violence and family dispute resolution

    Open AccessAmy Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy G Applegate et al.ARTICLEPsychology Public Policy and Law2021

    We report 1-year follow-up outcomes from a randomized controlled trial involving parents resolving separation or divorce-related disputes and reporting high levels of intimate partner violence (IPV). We compared traditional litigation to two mediation approaches designed to protect parent safety (i.e., shuttle and videoconferencing) at a court-annexed mediation division. The sample was not nationally representative, limiting generalizability. We …

  • Intimate partner violence (IPV) and family dispute resolution

    Open AccessAmy Holtzworth-Munroe, Connie J A Beck et al.ARTICLEPsychology Public Policy and Law2020Cited by: 1

    This randomized controlled trial, involving parents seeking to resolve their separation- or divorce-related disputes and reporting high levels of intimate partner violence (IPV), compared return-to-court (traditional litigation, n = 67 cases) to 2 mediation approaches designed to protect parent safety (i.e., shuttle, n = 64 cases; videoconferencing, n = 65 cases) at a court-annexed mediation division. We present immediate outcomes, which showed s…

  • Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others

    Open AccessSapna Cheryan, Sianna A Ziegler et al.ARTICLEPsychological Bulletin2017Cited by: 128References: 7

    Women obtain more than half of U.S. undergraduate degrees in biology, chemistry, and mathematics, yet they earn less than 20% of computer science, engineering, and physics undergraduate degrees (National Science Foundation, 2014a). Gender differences in interest in computer science, engineering, and physics appear even before college. Why are women represented in some science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields more than other…

  • The pipeline project

    Open AccessMartin Schweinsberg, Nikhil Madan et al.ARTICLEJournal of Experimental Social…2016Cited by: 16References: 68

    This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replica…