Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intimate partner violence and family dispute resolution

1-Yearfollow-Up Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Shuttlemediation, Videoconferencing Mediation, and Litigation

Bibliographic Data

ID12434405
AuthorsAmy Holtzworth-Munroe (0000-0002-1717-1944, corresponding author), Amy G Applegate (0000-0003-4714-4987), Connie J A Beck (0000-0001-6703-3534), Fernanda S Rossi (0000-0001-5338-8529), Jeannie M Adams, Lily J Jiang (0000-0002-8769-6535), Claire S Tomlinson (0000-0002-9349-215X), Darrell F Hale
Year2021
Volume27
Issue4
Pages581-596
Publication date2021-07-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology Public Policy and Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1076-8971 • E-ISSN: 1939-1528
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/law0000309
OpenAlexW3185899439
LanguageEN
Citations received3

We report 1-year follow-up outcomes from a randomized controlled trial involving parents resolving separation or divorce-related disputes and reporting high levels of intimate partner violence (IPV). We compared traditional litigation to two mediation approaches designed to protect parent safety (i.e., shuttle and videoconferencing) at a court-annexed mediation division. The sample was not nationally representative, limiting generalizability. We found no significant differences across conditions in parent reports of satisfaction with the process, level of continuing IPV or interparental conflict, parenting quality, parent functioning, or child functioning. Parents in traditional litigation, relative to parents in mediation, reported significantly more social support. Also, parents in videoconferencing, versus those in shuttle, mediation reported more PTSD symptoms from IPV. Based on coding of legal records, no significant condition differences emerged in relitigation rates in the family court case or charges of study case IPV-related incidents. Given few differences across study conditions, including in satisfaction levels, in contrast to the immediate outcomes, the 1-year follow-up findings do not clearly favor mediation or litigation. We conclude that when both parents in cases with reported high IPV are willing to mediate, mediation designed with safety protocols and carried out in a protected environment by well-trained staff may be an appropriate alternative to traditional litigation. We consider implications of our findings; for example, we discuss implications of the form of videoconferencing mediation examined for conducting online mediation, including during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alternative dispute resolution · Dispute mechanism · Dispute resolution · Domestic violence · Family mediation · Lawyer supported mediation · Mediation · Medical emergency · Poison control · Political science · Randomized controlled trial · Suicide prevention · Telecommunications · Videoconferencing · Engineering · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Internal Medicine

  • Parents reporting partner violence

    Open Access•Lily J Jiang, Amy G Applegate et al.•Conflict Resolution Quarterly•2023

  • Enhancing Safety for Separating Families Affected by Domestic and Family Violence

    Open Access•Krella Kristel, Kristel A Krella et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2026

  • Intimate Partner Violence Predicting Outcomes in Specialized Mediation and Traditional Litigation

    Open Access•Holly Huber Gifford, Lily J Jiang et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2023

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae