Rupert M Pearse
Biographic Data
| ID | 3604162 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rupert M Pearse |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rupert M |
| FAMILY NAME | Pearse |
| SIGNATURE | PEARSE R M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Queen Mary University of London |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4373-5934 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Clinical context and communication in shared decision-making about major surgery: Findings from a qualitative study with colorectal, orthopaedic and cardiac patients
Increasing numbers of older people undergo major surgery in the United Kingdom (UK), with many at high risk of complications due to age, co-morbidities or frailty. This article reports on a study of such patients and their clinicians engaged in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is a collaborative approach that seeks to value and centre patients' preferences, potentially addressing asymmetries of knowledge and power between clinicians…
Health Resource Utilisation and Disparities: An Ecological Study of Admission Patterns Across Ethnicity in England Between 2017 and 2020
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted adverse outcomes in Asian, Black, and ethnic minority groups. More research is required to explore underlying ethnic health inequalities. In this study, we aim to examine pre-COVID ethnic inequalities more generally through healthcare utilisation to contextualise underlying inequalities that were present before the pandemic. DESIGN: This was an ecological study exploring all admissions to NHS …
Neither magic bullet nor a mere tool: Negotiating Multiple Logics of the Checklist in Healthcare Quality Improvement
Over two decades, the checklist has risen to prominence in healthcare improvement. This paper contributes to the debate between its proponents and critics, making the case for an Science and Technology Studies-informed understanding of the checklist that demonstrates the limitations of both the 'checklist-as-panacea' and 'checklist-as-socially-determined' positions. Attending to the checklist as a socio-material object endowed with affordances th…
Pathways to professionalism? Quality improvement, care pathways, and the interplay of standardisation and clinical autonomy
Care pathways are a prominent feature of efforts to improve healthcare quality, outcomes and accountability, but sociological studies of pathways often find professional resistance to standardisation. This qualitative study examined the adoption and adaptation of a novel pathway as part of a randomised controlled trial in an unusually complex, non-linear field - emergency general surgery - by teams of surgeons and physicians in six theoretically …
Pathways to professionalism? Quality improvement, care pathways, and the interplay of standardisation and clinical autonomy
Care pathways are a prominent feature of efforts to improve healthcare quality, outcomes and accountability, but sociological studies of pathways often find professional resistance to standardisation. This qualitative study examined the adoption and adaptation of a novel pathway as part of a randomised controlled trial in an unusually complex, non-linear field - emergency general surgery - by teams of surgeons and physicians in six theoretically …
Neither magic bullet nor a mere tool: Negotiating Multiple Logics of the Checklist in Healthcare Quality Improvement
Over two decades, the checklist has risen to prominence in healthcare improvement. This paper contributes to the debate between its proponents and critics, making the case for an Science and Technology Studies-informed understanding of the checklist that demonstrates the limitations of both the 'checklist-as-panacea' and 'checklist-as-socially-determined' positions. Attending to the checklist as a socio-material object endowed with affordances th…
Pathways to professionalism? Quality improvement, care pathways, and the interplay of standardisation and clinical autonomy
Care pathways are a prominent feature of efforts to improve healthcare quality, outcomes and accountability, but sociological studies of pathways often find professional resistance to standardisation. This qualitative study examined the adoption and adaptation of a novel pathway as part of a randomised controlled trial in an unusually complex, non-linear field - emergency general surgery - by teams of surgeons and physicians in six theoretically …
Neither magic bullet nor a mere tool: Negotiating Multiple Logics of the Checklist in Healthcare Quality Improvement
Over two decades, the checklist has risen to prominence in healthcare improvement. This paper contributes to the debate between its proponents and critics, making the case for an Science and Technology Studies-informed understanding of the checklist that demonstrates the limitations of both the 'checklist-as-panacea' and 'checklist-as-socially-determined' positions. Attending to the checklist as a socio-material object endowed with affordances th…
Health Resource Utilisation and Disparities: An Ecological Study of Admission Patterns Across Ethnicity in England Between 2017 and 2020
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted adverse outcomes in Asian, Black, and ethnic minority groups. More research is required to explore underlying ethnic health inequalities. In this study, we aim to examine pre-COVID ethnic inequalities more generally through healthcare utilisation to contextualise underlying inequalities that were present before the pandemic. DESIGN: This was an ecological study exploring all admissions to NHS …
Clinical context and communication in shared decision-making about major surgery: Findings from a qualitative study with colorectal, orthopaedic and cardiac patients
Increasing numbers of older people undergo major surgery in the United Kingdom (UK), with many at high risk of complications due to age, co-morbidities or frailty. This article reports on a study of such patients and their clinicians engaged in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is a collaborative approach that seeks to value and centre patients' preferences, potentially addressing asymmetries of knowledge and power between clinicians…
Medicine (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Healthcare Quality and Management (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works)