Paul Waldman
Biographic Data
| ID | 3620114 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Paul Waldman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Paul |
| FAMILY NAME | Waldman |
| SIGNATURE | WALDMAN P |
| AFFILIATIONS | ANNENBERG SCHOOL FOR COMMUNICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 28 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1997 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election
In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore described their policy positions in ways that made distinctions difficult to discern. The candidates’ambiguity was mirrored in public knowledge, as awareness of their issue positions was extremely low. Public ignorance of the candidates’actual positions was particularly damaging to Gore, since many voters were unaware that they agreed with the Democrat on a variety of issues. Since Gore's positions were more po…
Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election
In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore described their policy positions in ways that made distinctions difficult to discern. The candidates'ambiguity was mirrored in public knowledge, as awareness of their issue positions was extremely low. Public ignorance of the candidates'actual positions was particularly damaging to Gore, since many voters were unaware that they agreed with the Democrat on a variety of issues. Since Gore's positions were more po…
The Morning After: The Effect of the Network Call for Bush
By the weekend following the election of 2000, two possible frames were available to the press covering developments in Florida. In the first, Gore had won the popular vote and the outcome in the electoral college was uncertain. In the second, Bush was ahead in the vote in the state that would determine the results in the electoral college and, as such, the presumed victor until Gore proved otherwise. Elite discourse as revealed in Sunday morning…
Political Discussion in Primary States
Residents of Iowa and New Hampshire are exposed to a much more intense primary campaign than those in the rest of the country. One would therefore expect that those living in these two states would be more engaged with the primary election than residents of other states. Survey data indicate that while this proves to be true of those in New Hampshire, it does not appear to be the case in Iowa. While New Hampshire residents talked about politics m…
Newspaper Photographs and the 1996 Presidential Election: The Question of Bias
This article presents results of a content analysis of photographs of Bill Clinton and Bob Dole appearing in five major newspapers during the last two months of the 1996 presidential campaign. Clinton is found to have received slightly better pictorial treatment, with the most substantial difference found in the Chicago Tribune, an editorially conservative paper. In addition, a week-by-week analysis finds that photos of the two candidates rose an…
Mapping the discourse of the 1996 US presidential general election
Mapping Campaign Discourse: An Introduction
This article, which is a report of the Campaign Discourse Mapping Project, draws on the speeches, ads, and news of the 1960, 1980, 1988, 1992, and 1996 campaigns to debunk three widely held beliefs about presidential campaign discourse: that it has become more negative, that reporting on it has become more negative, and that there is little new from day to day in the stump speeches of the major party presidential condidates
Newspaper Photographs and the 1996 Presidential Election: The Question of Bias
This article presents results of a content analysis of photographs of Bill Clinton and Bob Dole appearing in five major newspapers during the last two months of the 1996 presidential campaign. Clinton is found to have received slightly better pictorial treatment, with the most substantial difference found in the Chicago Tribune, an editorially conservative paper. In addition, a week-by-week analysis finds that photos of the two candidates rose an…
Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election
In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore described their policy positions in ways that made distinctions difficult to discern. The candidates’ambiguity was mirrored in public knowledge, as awareness of their issue positions was extremely low. Public ignorance of the candidates’actual positions was particularly damaging to Gore, since many voters were unaware that they agreed with the Democrat on a variety of issues. Since Gore's positions were more po…
The Morning After: The Effect of the Network Call for Bush
By the weekend following the election of 2000, two possible frames were available to the press covering developments in Florida. In the first, Gore had won the popular vote and the outcome in the electoral college was uncertain. In the second, Bush was ahead in the vote in the state that would determine the results in the electoral college and, as such, the presumed victor until Gore proved otherwise. Elite discourse as revealed in Sunday morning…
Mapping the discourse of the 1996 US presidential general election
Mapping Campaign Discourse: An Introduction
This article, which is a report of the Campaign Discourse Mapping Project, draws on the speeches, ads, and news of the 1960, 1980, 1988, 1992, and 1996 campaigns to debunk three widely held beliefs about presidential campaign discourse: that it has become more negative, that reporting on it has become more negative, and that there is little new from day to day in the stump speeches of the major party presidential condidates
Mapping Campaign Discourse: An Introduction
This article, which is a report of the Campaign Discourse Mapping Project, draws on the speeches, ads, and news of the 1960, 1980, 1988, 1992, and 1996 campaigns to debunk three widely held beliefs about presidential campaign discourse: that it has become more negative, that reporting on it has become more negative, and that there is little new from day to day in the stump speeches of the major party presidential condidates
Newspaper Photographs and the 1996 Presidential Election: The Question of Bias
This article presents results of a content analysis of photographs of Bill Clinton and Bob Dole appearing in five major newspapers during the last two months of the 1996 presidential campaign. Clinton is found to have received slightly better pictorial treatment, with the most substantial difference found in the Chicago Tribune, an editorially conservative paper. In addition, a week-by-week analysis finds that photos of the two candidates rose an…
Mapping the discourse of the 1996 US presidential general election
Political Discussion in Primary States
Residents of Iowa and New Hampshire are exposed to a much more intense primary campaign than those in the rest of the country. One would therefore expect that those living in these two states would be more engaged with the primary election than residents of other states. Survey data indicate that while this proves to be true of those in New Hampshire, it does not appear to be the case in Iowa. While New Hampshire residents talked about politics m…
The Morning After: The Effect of the Network Call for Bush
By the weekend following the election of 2000, two possible frames were available to the press covering developments in Florida. In the first, Gore had won the popular vote and the outcome in the electoral college was uncertain. In the second, Bush was ahead in the vote in the state that would determine the results in the electoral college and, as such, the presumed victor until Gore proved otherwise. Elite discourse as revealed in Sunday morning…
Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election
In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore described their policy positions in ways that made distinctions difficult to discern. The candidates’ambiguity was mirrored in public knowledge, as awareness of their issue positions was extremely low. Public ignorance of the candidates’actual positions was particularly damaging to Gore, since many voters were unaware that they agreed with the Democrat on a variety of issues. Since Gore's positions were more po…
Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election
In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore described their policy positions in ways that made distinctions difficult to discern. The candidates'ambiguity was mirrored in public knowledge, as awareness of their issue positions was extremely low. Public ignorance of the candidates'actual positions was particularly damaging to Gore, since many voters were unaware that they agreed with the Democrat on a variety of issues. Since Gore's positions were more po…
Political science (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Presidential system (5 works) · Presidential election (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Media Studies and Communication (3 works) · Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 works) · Social Media and Politics (3 works)