Political Discussion in Primary States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9759637 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Waldman (Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 572 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-32 |
| Publication date | 2000-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/000271620057200106 |
| OpenAlex | W2018598288 |
| Language | EN |
Residents of Iowa and New Hampshire are exposed to a much more intense primary campaign than those in the rest of the country. One would therefore expect that those living in these two states would be more engaged with the primary election than residents of other states. Survey data indicate that while this proves to be true of those in New Hampshire, it does not appear to be the case in Iowa. While New Hampshire residents talked about politics more frequently than those in other states—and with greater frequency as their primary approached—Iowa residents discussed politics less often than those in states with primaries on Super Tuesday. The same result was obtained examining only survey respondents who rated themselves very likely to vote in their primary or caucus
Caucus · Physics · Political science · Politics · Primary (astronomy · Sociology · Cyprus History, Politics, Society · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Medicine · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics · Gerontology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |