Dan Orr
Biographic Data
| ID | 3620498 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Dan Orr |
| GIVEN NAMES | Dan |
| FAMILY NAME | Orr |
| SIGNATURE | ORR D |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Pennsylvania |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2001 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Voter News Service and the 2000 Election Night Calls
After examining the rhetoric of the network broadcast coverage on election night 2000, it is concluded that although individual "decision desk" call times were not identical across networks, there was a consistent pattern of correct and incorrect calls. The language of the election night broadcasts undercut network credibility on two counts. First, the networks largely failed to acknowledge their common reliance on the Voter News Service for thei…
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
The Voter News Service and the 2000 Election Night Calls
After examining the rhetoric of the network broadcast coverage on election night 2000, it is concluded that although individual "decision desk" call times were not identical across networks, there was a consistent pattern of correct and incorrect calls. The language of the election night broadcasts undercut network credibility on two counts. First, the networks largely failed to acknowledge their common reliance on the Voter News Service for thei…
Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Advertising (1 works) · Business (1 works) · Chemistry (1 works) · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (1 works) · Credibility (1 works) · Desk (1 works) · Economics (1 works) · Epistemology (1 works)