What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9764331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688, Annenberg School for Communication and director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Michael G Hagen, Dan Orr, Lesley Sillaman, Suzanne Morse, Suzanne W Morse, Kim Kirn |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 572 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 12-16 |
| Publication date | 2000-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002716200572001003 |
| OpenAlex | W4251975286 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
Economics · Epistemology · Political economy · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · Chemistry · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Philosophy · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Systems and Governance
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |