Michael G Hagen
Biographic Data
| ID | 4194033 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Michael G Hagen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Michael G |
| FAMILY NAME | Hagen |
| SIGNATURE | HAGEN M G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Temple University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 152 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 12 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1986 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
How Trump Happened: A System Shock Decades in the Making
How Trump Happened: A System Shock Decades in the Making." Congress & the Presidency, 48(2), pp. 283–284
Finding the Cost of Campaign Advertising
Debates about campaign finance often point to television advertising as a major reason for the high cost of campaigning, but the debates are too rarely informed by systematic data on advertising costs. A leading source tracking campaign ads, the Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), offers data about both the volume and the estimated cost of advertising being purchased. Here, we test the accuracy of CMAG cost data by comparing CMAG estimates to r…
Elections and Representative Democracy in the States” Temple University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania May 30–31, 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, campaigns suddenly seem to matter, as do questions about the electoral process. Professors Johnston, Hagen and Jamieson have examined the US electoral process as an integrated event spanning a full year, drawing upon a data set that is massive in scale and novel in execution: the Annenberg 2000 Election Study. The scale of their fieldwork is such that they have been able to isolate key turning p…
The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics (Communication, Society & Politics)
Direct Democracy in Practice: The Initiative as a Legislative Institution
Ellis, Richard J. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2002. Pp. xi, 260. $35.00 hardbound, $17.95 softbound.Gerber, Elisabeth R. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. Pp. xii, 171. $55.00 hardbound, $19.95 softbound.Sabato, Larry J., Howard R. Ernst, and Bruce A. Larson, eds., Dangerous De…
Response to Matsusaka: Estimating the Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Policy Responsiveness
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
Dynamics of the 2000 Republican Primaries
The 2000 presidential primaries were among the liveliest in recent memory. This article is the authors' first account of the changing fortunes of the candidates from the Iowa caucuses through Super Tuesday. It is based upon the nomination phase of the Annenberg 2000 Election Surveys, a collection of nearly 32,000 interviews conducted from November through March, nationwide and in special-purpose state and regional studies, on a broad range of pol…
Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion
One of the most important claims about the ballot initiative process is that it makes government more responsive to public demands than would be the case under a purely representative system. This argument has not been subject to systematic empirical analysis. In this article we test the claim about enhanced responsiveness, drawing on public opinion data, measures of policy outcomes, and information about the use of initiatives in the American st…
References to racial issues
Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics
Citizens do not choose sides on issues like busing or abortion whimsically. They have reasons for their preferences – certainly they can give reasons for them. But how is this possible? Citizens as a rule pay little attention to politics, indeed take only a modest interest in it even during election campaigns when their interest in politics is at its height. And since they pay little attention to politics, it is hardly surprising that they know l…
Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion
One of the most important claims about the ballot initiative process is that it makes government more responsive to public demands than would be the case under a purely representative system. This argument has not been subject to systematic empirical analysis. In this article we test the claim about enhanced responsiveness, drawing on public opinion data, measures of policy outcomes, and information about the use of initiatives in the American st…
Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics
Citizens do not choose sides on issues like busing or abortion whimsically. They have reasons for their preferences – certainly they can give reasons for them. But how is this possible? Citizens as a rule pay little attention to politics, indeed take only a modest interest in it even during election campaigns when their interest in politics is at its height. And since they pay little attention to politics, it is hardly surprising that they know l…
Response to Matsusaka: Estimating the Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Policy Responsiveness
References to racial issues
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
Dynamics of the 2000 Republican Primaries
The 2000 presidential primaries were among the liveliest in recent memory. This article is the authors' first account of the changing fortunes of the candidates from the Iowa caucuses through Super Tuesday. It is based upon the nomination phase of the Annenberg 2000 Election Surveys, a collection of nearly 32,000 interviews conducted from November through March, nationwide and in special-purpose state and regional studies, on a broad range of pol…
Direct Democracy in Practice: The Initiative as a Legislative Institution
Ellis, Richard J. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2002. Pp. xi, 260. $35.00 hardbound, $17.95 softbound.Gerber, Elisabeth R. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. Pp. xii, 171. $55.00 hardbound, $19.95 softbound.Sabato, Larry J., Howard R. Ernst, and Bruce A. Larson, eds., Dangerous De…
Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics
Citizens do not choose sides on issues like busing or abortion whimsically. They have reasons for their preferences – certainly they can give reasons for them. But how is this possible? Citizens as a rule pay little attention to politics, indeed take only a modest interest in it even during election campaigns when their interest in politics is at its height. And since they pay little attention to politics, it is hardly surprising that they know l…
References to racial issues
Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion
One of the most important claims about the ballot initiative process is that it makes government more responsive to public demands than would be the case under a purely representative system. This argument has not been subject to systematic empirical analysis. In this article we test the claim about enhanced responsiveness, drawing on public opinion data, measures of policy outcomes, and information about the use of initiatives in the American st…
What Did the Leading Candidates Say, and Did It Matter
The Annenberg 2000 study of the primaries found that voters learned the issue distinctions stressed by the candidates and that these distinctions influenced votes. The study also found that those in heavily contested primaries learned more than did voters in states with less contact with the candidates and their campaigns
Dynamics of the 2000 Republican Primaries
The 2000 presidential primaries were among the liveliest in recent memory. This article is the authors' first account of the changing fortunes of the candidates from the Iowa caucuses through Super Tuesday. It is based upon the nomination phase of the Annenberg 2000 Election Surveys, a collection of nearly 32,000 interviews conducted from November through March, nationwide and in special-purpose state and regional studies, on a broad range of pol…
Response to Matsusaka: Estimating the Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Policy Responsiveness
Direct Democracy in Practice: The Initiative as a Legislative Institution
Ellis, Richard J. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2002. Pp. xi, 260. $35.00 hardbound, $17.95 softbound.Gerber, Elisabeth R. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. Pp. xii, 171. $55.00 hardbound, $19.95 softbound.Sabato, Larry J., Howard R. Ernst, and Bruce A. Larson, eds., Dangerous De…
The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, campaigns suddenly seem to matter, as do questions about the electoral process. Professors Johnston, Hagen and Jamieson have examined the US electoral process as an integrated event spanning a full year, drawing upon a data set that is massive in scale and novel in execution: the Annenberg 2000 Election Study. The scale of their fieldwork is such that they have been able to isolate key turning p…
The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics (Communication, Society & Politics)
Elections and Representative Democracy in the States” Temple University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania May 30–31, 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Finding the Cost of Campaign Advertising
Debates about campaign finance often point to television advertising as a major reason for the high cost of campaigning, but the debates are too rarely informed by systematic data on advertising costs. A leading source tracking campaign ads, the Campaign Media Analysis Group (CMAG), offers data about both the volume and the estimated cost of advertising being purchased. Here, we test the accuracy of CMAG cost data by comparing CMAG estimates to r…
How Trump Happened: A System Shock Decades in the Making
How Trump Happened: A System Shock Decades in the Making." Congress & the Presidency, 48(2), pp. 283–284
Political science (11 works) · Politics (10 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 works) · Law (9 works) · Law (8 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Public Administration (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Economics (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works)