Jessica Peet
Biographic Data
| ID | 3777436 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jessica Peet |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jessica |
| FAMILY NAME | Peet |
| SIGNATURE | PEET J |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 21 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Eclecticism or exclusivity? The (critical) pragmatist ethos of (intersectional) analytic eclecticism
Eclecticism in International Relations (IR) claims to reject the rigid boundaries set by various theoretical traditions, yet, in practice, it falls short of moving the field "beyond paradigms" and tends to produce analytical exclusivity rather than eclecticism. This exclusivity is the result of Sil and Katzenstein's investment in tenets of American pragmatism. These tenets favor consensus and universalism, leading to the reproduction and exclusiv…
Gender and Civilian Victimization in War
A(nother) Dark Side of the Protection Racket
This article builds on feminist readings of war and conflict generally and of the civilian immunity principle specifically to argue that gender is crucial to the story of how and why civilians are intentionally targeted by belligerents. It demonstrates that civilian victimization is directly linked to the gendered logic of the immunity principle. Particularly, we contend that civilian victimization is a logical extension of wars justified by prot…
A(nother) Dark Side of the Protection Racket
This article builds on feminist readings of war and conflict generally and of the civilian immunity principle specifically to argue that gender is crucial to the story of how and why civilians are intentionally targeted by belligerents. It demonstrates that civilian victimization is directly linked to the gendered logic of the immunity principle. Particularly, we contend that civilian victimization is a logical extension of wars justified by prot…
Eclecticism or exclusivity? The (critical) pragmatist ethos of (intersectional) analytic eclecticism
Eclecticism in International Relations (IR) claims to reject the rigid boundaries set by various theoretical traditions, yet, in practice, it falls short of moving the field "beyond paradigms" and tends to produce analytical exclusivity rather than eclecticism. This exclusivity is the result of Sil and Katzenstein's investment in tenets of American pragmatism. These tenets favor consensus and universalism, leading to the reproduction and exclusiv…
A(nother) Dark Side of the Protection Racket
This article builds on feminist readings of war and conflict generally and of the civilian immunity principle specifically to argue that gender is crucial to the story of how and why civilians are intentionally targeted by belligerents. It demonstrates that civilian victimization is directly linked to the gendered logic of the immunity principle. Particularly, we contend that civilian victimization is a logical extension of wars justified by prot…
Gender and Civilian Victimization in War
Eclecticism or exclusivity? The (critical) pragmatist ethos of (intersectional) analytic eclecticism
Eclecticism in International Relations (IR) claims to reject the rigid boundaries set by various theoretical traditions, yet, in practice, it falls short of moving the field "beyond paradigms" and tends to produce analytical exclusivity rather than eclecticism. This exclusivity is the result of Sil and Katzenstein's investment in tenets of American pragmatism. These tenets favor consensus and universalism, leading to the reproduction and exclusiv…
Political science (3 works) · Criminology (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender, Security, and Conflict (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Case studies (1 work)