Eclecticism or exclusivity? The (critical) pragmatist ethos of (intersectional) analytic eclecticism

Bibliographic Data

ID5003015
AuthorsJessica Peet, Jessica L Peet (corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume75
Issue3
Pages420-432
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7020 • E-ISSN: 2052-465X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0020702020954552
OpenAlexW3086003377
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Eclecticism in International Relations (IR) claims to reject the rigid boundaries set by various theoretical traditions, yet, in practice, it falls short of moving the field "beyond paradigms" and tends to produce analytical exclusivity rather than eclecticism. This exclusivity is the result of Sil and Katzenstein's investment in tenets of American pragmatism. These tenets favor consensus and universalism, leading to the reproduction and exclusivity of the theoretical status quo. Dissolving paradigmatic boundaries requires a more critical form of pragmatism. Drawing on the common origins of feminism and pragmatism paired with the contemporary feminist concept of intersectionality, this essay proposes a critical pragmatist ethos and an intersectional analytic eclecticism. This can produce a more inclusive form of analytic eclecticism and render visible the power dynamics that shape experiences as well as academic scholarship. Only when analytic eclecticism is informed by intersectionality and a critical pragmatism might it actually move IR "beyond paradigms

Eclecticism · Epistemology · Ethos · Intersectionality · Political science · Power (physics · Pragmatism · Scholarship · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Science Research and Education

Tools

Open DOI