Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ann-Sophie Barwich

Biographic Data

ID3785047
NAMEAnn-Sophie Barwich
GIVEN NAMESAnn-Sophie
FAMILY NAMEBarwich
SIGNATUREBARWICH A
AFFILIATIONSIndiana University Bloomington
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • Science as intuition pump

    Jag Williams, Ann‐sophie Barwich et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    We take a fresh look at Daniel Dennett’s naturalist legacy in philosophy, focusing on his rethinking of philosophical methods. Critics sometimes mistake Dennett for promoting a crude naturalism or dismissing philosophical tools like first-person intuition. We present his approach as more methodologically radical, blending science and philosophy in a way that treats inquiry as an evolving process. Concepts and intuitions are tested and adjusted in…

  • Tools of Neuroscience Experiment

    John Bickle, Carl F Craver et al.•BOOK•Tools of Neuroscience Experiment•2022

  • The Tools of Neuroscience Experiment

    John Bickle, Carl F Craver et al.•BOOK•Tools of Neuroscience Experiment•2021

  • How to be rational about empirical success in ongoing science

    Open Access•Ann-Sophie Barwich•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018•References: 52

    Empirical success is a central criterion for scientific decision-making. Yet its understanding in philosophical studies of science deserves renewed attention: Should philosophers think differently about the advancement of science when they deal with the uncertainty of outcome in ongoing research in comparison with historical episodes? This paper argues that normative appeals to empirical success in the evaluation of competing scientific explanati…

No prominent works on this page.

  • How to be rational about empirical success in ongoing science

    Open Access•Ann-Sophie Barwich•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018•References: 52

    Empirical success is a central criterion for scientific decision-making. Yet its understanding in philosophical studies of science deserves renewed attention: Should philosophers think differently about the advancement of science when they deal with the uncertainty of outcome in ongoing research in comparison with historical episodes? This paper argues that normative appeals to empirical success in the evaluation of competing scientific explanati…

  • The Tools of Neuroscience Experiment

    John Bickle, Carl F Craver et al.•BOOK•Tools of Neuroscience Experiment•2021

  • Tools of Neuroscience Experiment

    John Bickle, Carl F Craver et al.•BOOK•Tools of Neuroscience Experiment•2022

  • Science as intuition pump

    Jag Williams, Ann‐sophie Barwich et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    We take a fresh look at Daniel Dennett’s naturalist legacy in philosophy, focusing on his rethinking of philosophical methods. Critics sometimes mistake Dennett for promoting a crude naturalism or dismissing philosophical tools like first-person intuition. We present his approach as more methodologically radical, blending science and philosophy in a way that treats inquiry as an evolving process. Concepts and intuitions are tested and adjusted in…

Cognitive science (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 work) · Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Context (archaeology (1 work) · Embodied and Extended Cognition (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae