Anthony Warner
Biographic Data
| ID | 3842461 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Anthony Warner |
| GIVEN NAMES | Anthony |
| FAMILY NAME | Warner |
| SIGNATURE | WARNER A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of York |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 14 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1975 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Why DO dove
The development of “supportive” (or “periphrastic”) DO in English suffered a curious and sharp reversal late in the 16th century in negative declaratives and questions according to Ellegård's (1953) database, with a recovery late in the following century. This article examines the variation between DO and the full verb in negative declaratives in this database, from 1500 to 1710. It is shown that both register variation and age-grading are releva…
Diachronic syntax
Extending the paradigm
Predicting the Progressive Passive
The English progressive passive (e.g. is being carried) is first attested in the second half of the eighteenth century. The paper offers a new interpretation of this development as integrated into a series of changes which affected be (and have) at this period. It arose not as a combination of progressive and passive constructions but (with the other changes) was a consequence of the reduction of inflection in auxiliaries which followed the loss …
Multiple heads and minor categories in generalized phrase-structure grammar
Feature percolation, unary features, and the coordination of English NPs
Simplifying lexical defaults in generalized phrase structure grammar
Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax
Principles of diachronic syntax
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Infinitive marking in the wyclifite sermons
Principles of diachronic syntax
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Why DO dove
The development of “supportive” (or “periphrastic”) DO in English suffered a curious and sharp reversal late in the 16th century in negative declaratives and questions according to Ellegård's (1953) database, with a recovery late in the following century. This article examines the variation between DO and the full verb in negative declaratives in this database, from 1500 to 1710. It is shown that both register variation and age-grading are releva…
Predicting the Progressive Passive
The English progressive passive (e.g. is being carried) is first attested in the second half of the eighteenth century. The paper offers a new interpretation of this development as integrated into a series of changes which affected be (and have) at this period. It arose not as a combination of progressive and passive constructions but (with the other changes) was a consequence of the reduction of inflection in auxiliaries which followed the loss …
Extending the paradigm
Feature percolation, unary features, and the coordination of English NPs
Infinitive marking in the wyclifite sermons
Principles of diachronic syntax
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax
Simplifying lexical defaults in generalized phrase structure grammar
Feature percolation, unary features, and the coordination of English NPs
Multiple heads and minor categories in generalized phrase-structure grammar
Predicting the Progressive Passive
The English progressive passive (e.g. is being carried) is first attested in the second half of the eighteenth century. The paper offers a new interpretation of this development as integrated into a series of changes which affected be (and have) at this period. It arose not as a combination of progressive and passive constructions but (with the other changes) was a consequence of the reduction of inflection in auxiliaries which followed the loss …
Extending the paradigm
Diachronic syntax
Why DO dove
The development of “supportive” (or “periphrastic”) DO in English suffered a curious and sharp reversal late in the 16th century in negative declaratives and questions according to Ellegård's (1953) database, with a recovery late in the following century. This article examines the variation between DO and the full verb in negative declaratives in this database, from 1500 to 1710. It is shown that both register variation and age-grading are releva…
Linguistics (9 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 works) · Linguistic Variation and Morphology (4 works) · Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Syntax (4 works) · History (3 works) · Lexicography and Language Studies (3 works)