Why DO dove
Evidence for register variation in Early Modern English negatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12233648 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony Warner (University of York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 03 |
| Publication date | 2005-09-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Variation and Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-3945 • E-ISSN: 1469-8021 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0954394505050106 |
| OpenAlex | W2142287602 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 6 |
The development of “supportive” (or “periphrastic”) DO in English suffered a curious and sharp reversal late in the 16th century in negative declaratives and questions according to Ellegård's (1953) database, with a recovery late in the following century. This article examines the variation between DO and the full verb in negative declaratives in this database, from 1500 to 1710. It is shown that both register variation and age-grading are relevant, and that the periods 1500–1575 and 1600–1710 have radically distinct properties. The second period shows substantial age-grading, and is interpreted as having introduced a fresh evaluative principle governing register variation. Negative questions supply data that suggest that the development of clitic negation may have been implicated in the development of the new evaluation. This change in evaluation accounts for the apparent reversal in the development of DO, and we can abandon the view that it was a consequence of grammatical restructuring.I want very sincerely to thank Tony Kroch for giving me an electronic version of the database used by Ellegård (1953), in an act of straightforward generosity; also Ann Taylor for her work in compiling it, and Celeste Tereszczuk who completed this task. I am also grateful to the British Academy who funded a period of research leave which gave me time to investigate this, and to audiences at ICEHL 12 (held at the University of Santiago), at the Linguistics Research Seminar at the University of York, and at NWAVE 32 for their comments
Art · Bulgarian · Generosity · Grading (engineering · Linguistics · Negation · Period (music · Political science · Register (sociolinguistics · Restructuring · Variation (astronomy · Verb · History · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Empirical foundations for an integrated study of language evolution
The rise of Scots do – transfer or innovation
‘The vsuall speach of the Court’? Investigating language change in the Tudor family network (1544–1556)
Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English
Deriving the Constant Rate Effect
The diachronic semantics of English again
Treebanks in Historical Syntax
The diffusion of language change in real time
Parataxis and hypotaxis in historical corpora
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |