Jeongyoon Lee
Biographic Data
| ID | 3893743 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jeongyoon Lee |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jeongyoon |
| FAMILY NAME | Lee |
| SIGNATURE | LEE J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Kentucky |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6991-1238 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 39 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 12 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
When boards connect during challenging times
Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem
Sharing scientific and technical information plays a vital role in fostering more deliberate political dynamics within policy subsystems, according to the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). However, obstacles to this exchange are not well understood. Our research, guided by theories of social exchange and network embeddedness, explores how power imbalances relate to the reciprocal exchange of scientific information. Using network visualization a…
Why are policy actors so distrustful of each other, and how? Cognitive, behavioral, and endogenous relational sources of perceived distrust in governance networks
In the age of collaboration and shared governance, paradoxically, distrust manifests frequently in government and political institutions and is seen as dysfunctional to democracy, making governing networks challenging. Yet, previous studies emphasize the significance of promoting trust more than addressing distrust in networks. Distrust differs from the absence of trust. It involves relationships characterized by doubt, suspicion, or opportunism.…
How can political conflict in adversarial policy networks promote their coordination
This article advances a new and important perspective on networks, focusing on political conflicts rather than the mainstream focus on positive aspects such as trust, collaboration and cooperation. The aim of the research is to provide insights into the factors that intensify competition, and propose strategies that can mitigate its effects, thereby enhancing network coordination. It uses the case of local fracking policy networks in the US. Draw…
Compatibility of the Incompatible
Asymmetric power has been found to hinder the development of trust that is essential for structuring policy subsystems or networks. Using a multinomial logistic analysis of a local hydraulic fracturing policy network in New York, our findings indicate that (1) power imbalance affects the coexistence of trust and distrust and (2) power imbalance interacting with certain types of social relationships (policy communication, regulation, and knowledge…
How Do Government Grants Affect Nonprofit Financial Effectiveness? The Mediation Role of Process Accountability
This study examines the role of process accountability in the association between government grants and nonprofit financial effectiveness. Using the Internal Revenue Service Form 990 from 2013 to 2017, our mediation analyses find that government grants make nonprofits accountable for their processes. However, process accountability can reduce nonprofit financial effectiveness and suppress the positive relationship between government grants and no…
Identity-based subgroups and information exchange in adversarial policy networks
While information exchange is essential in the policy process, little is known about how divergent subgroups filter actors’ technical and political information exchange, blocking learning processes. Guided by social identity, group entitativity, and self-categorisation theories, we introduce the concept and measurement of identity-based subgroups referring to informal clusters shaped by the self-referent perception of similarities among actors. T…
Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults
Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19–64 years were drawn from the 2012–2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method (N = 3292 for the prediction of suicidal ideation, N = 488 for the …
Keeping Your Enemies Close
Explaining the mechanisms that structure policy networks is an important subject of public management research as networks are key mechanisms of convening actors across public, private, and nonprofit sectors to design and implement public policies. Previous research focuses on the positive role of trust in building network structures in the context of social service delivery. But many policy networks can be adversarial, particularly those that op…
How Does Policy Funding Context Matter to Networks? Resource Dependence, Advocacy Mobilization, and Network Structures
This study explores how policy funding context—defined as whether funding for a social service policy domain is discretionary or mandated—affects network structures in social service domains. We present comparative findings from two social service policy networks which differ with respect to funding context: A 47-actor adult basic education policy network that is funded discretionarily and a 40-actor mental health policy network where spending is…
Lethal Connections
Using stochastic methods we illustrate that the Provisional Irish Republican Army's (PIRA) network is clustered along three primary dimensions: (a) brigade affiliation, (b) whether the member participated in violent activities, and (c) task/role within PIRA. While most brigades tended to foster connections within the brigade (that is, “closure”), the tendency to do so varied across the organization. Members who engaged with violent activities wer…
Same Differences
Though many polities have adopted collaborative approaches to policy decision processes, few cross-national comparative studies exist. To fill that gap the article presents a comparative study of the US and Korea, posing this question: to what extent are differences in the structure of Korean and US policy networks explained by differences in political-institutional and cultural contexts? A set of propositions regarding this question are generate…
Keeping Your Enemies Close
Explaining the mechanisms that structure policy networks is an important subject of public management research as networks are key mechanisms of convening actors across public, private, and nonprofit sectors to design and implement public policies. Previous research focuses on the positive role of trust in building network structures in the context of social service delivery. But many policy networks can be adversarial, particularly those that op…
Lethal Connections
Using stochastic methods we illustrate that the Provisional Irish Republican Army's (PIRA) network is clustered along three primary dimensions: (a) brigade affiliation, (b) whether the member participated in violent activities, and (c) task/role within PIRA. While most brigades tended to foster connections within the brigade (that is, “closure”), the tendency to do so varied across the organization. Members who engaged with violent activities wer…
How Does Policy Funding Context Matter to Networks? Resource Dependence, Advocacy Mobilization, and Network Structures
This study explores how policy funding context—defined as whether funding for a social service policy domain is discretionary or mandated—affects network structures in social service domains. We present comparative findings from two social service policy networks which differ with respect to funding context: A 47-actor adult basic education policy network that is funded discretionarily and a 40-actor mental health policy network where spending is…
Identity-based subgroups and information exchange in adversarial policy networks
While information exchange is essential in the policy process, little is known about how divergent subgroups filter actors’ technical and political information exchange, blocking learning processes. Guided by social identity, group entitativity, and self-categorisation theories, we introduce the concept and measurement of identity-based subgroups referring to informal clusters shaped by the self-referent perception of similarities among actors. T…
Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem
Sharing scientific and technical information plays a vital role in fostering more deliberate political dynamics within policy subsystems, according to the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). However, obstacles to this exchange are not well understood. Our research, guided by theories of social exchange and network embeddedness, explores how power imbalances relate to the reciprocal exchange of scientific information. Using network visualization a…
How Do Government Grants Affect Nonprofit Financial Effectiveness? The Mediation Role of Process Accountability
This study examines the role of process accountability in the association between government grants and nonprofit financial effectiveness. Using the Internal Revenue Service Form 990 from 2013 to 2017, our mediation analyses find that government grants make nonprofits accountable for their processes. However, process accountability can reduce nonprofit financial effectiveness and suppress the positive relationship between government grants and no…
Same Differences
Though many polities have adopted collaborative approaches to policy decision processes, few cross-national comparative studies exist. To fill that gap the article presents a comparative study of the US and Korea, posing this question: to what extent are differences in the structure of Korean and US policy networks explained by differences in political-institutional and cultural contexts? A set of propositions regarding this question are generate…
Same Differences
Though many polities have adopted collaborative approaches to policy decision processes, few cross-national comparative studies exist. To fill that gap the article presents a comparative study of the US and Korea, posing this question: to what extent are differences in the structure of Korean and US policy networks explained by differences in political-institutional and cultural contexts? A set of propositions regarding this question are generate…
Lethal Connections
Using stochastic methods we illustrate that the Provisional Irish Republican Army's (PIRA) network is clustered along three primary dimensions: (a) brigade affiliation, (b) whether the member participated in violent activities, and (c) task/role within PIRA. While most brigades tended to foster connections within the brigade (that is, “closure”), the tendency to do so varied across the organization. Members who engaged with violent activities wer…
How Does Policy Funding Context Matter to Networks? Resource Dependence, Advocacy Mobilization, and Network Structures
This study explores how policy funding context—defined as whether funding for a social service policy domain is discretionary or mandated—affects network structures in social service domains. We present comparative findings from two social service policy networks which differ with respect to funding context: A 47-actor adult basic education policy network that is funded discretionarily and a 40-actor mental health policy network where spending is…
Keeping Your Enemies Close
Explaining the mechanisms that structure policy networks is an important subject of public management research as networks are key mechanisms of convening actors across public, private, and nonprofit sectors to design and implement public policies. Previous research focuses on the positive role of trust in building network structures in the context of social service delivery. But many policy networks can be adversarial, particularly those that op…
Machine learning prediction of suicidal ideation, planning, and attempt among Korean adults
Suicide remains the leading cause of premature death in South Korea. This study aims to develop machine learning algorithms for screening Korean adults at risk for suicidal ideation and suicide planning or attempt. Two sets of balanced data for Korean adults aged 19–64 years were drawn from the 2012–2019 waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study using the random down-sampling method (N = 3292 for the prediction of suicidal ideation, N = 488 for the …
How Do Government Grants Affect Nonprofit Financial Effectiveness? The Mediation Role of Process Accountability
This study examines the role of process accountability in the association between government grants and nonprofit financial effectiveness. Using the Internal Revenue Service Form 990 from 2013 to 2017, our mediation analyses find that government grants make nonprofits accountable for their processes. However, process accountability can reduce nonprofit financial effectiveness and suppress the positive relationship between government grants and no…
Identity-based subgroups and information exchange in adversarial policy networks
While information exchange is essential in the policy process, little is known about how divergent subgroups filter actors’ technical and political information exchange, blocking learning processes. Guided by social identity, group entitativity, and self-categorisation theories, we introduce the concept and measurement of identity-based subgroups referring to informal clusters shaped by the self-referent perception of similarities among actors. T…
Compatibility of the Incompatible
Asymmetric power has been found to hinder the development of trust that is essential for structuring policy subsystems or networks. Using a multinomial logistic analysis of a local hydraulic fracturing policy network in New York, our findings indicate that (1) power imbalance affects the coexistence of trust and distrust and (2) power imbalance interacting with certain types of social relationships (policy communication, regulation, and knowledge…
Exploring power imbalance in reciprocal scientific information sharing within a hydraulic fracturing policy subsystem
Sharing scientific and technical information plays a vital role in fostering more deliberate political dynamics within policy subsystems, according to the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). However, obstacles to this exchange are not well understood. Our research, guided by theories of social exchange and network embeddedness, explores how power imbalances relate to the reciprocal exchange of scientific information. Using network visualization a…
Why are policy actors so distrustful of each other, and how? Cognitive, behavioral, and endogenous relational sources of perceived distrust in governance networks
In the age of collaboration and shared governance, paradoxically, distrust manifests frequently in government and political institutions and is seen as dysfunctional to democracy, making governing networks challenging. Yet, previous studies emphasize the significance of promoting trust more than addressing distrust in networks. Distrust differs from the absence of trust. It involves relationships characterized by doubt, suspicion, or opportunism.…
How can political conflict in adversarial policy networks promote their coordination
This article advances a new and important perspective on networks, focusing on political conflicts rather than the mainstream focus on positive aspects such as trust, collaboration and cooperation. The aim of the research is to provide insights into the factors that intensify competition, and propose strategies that can mitigate its effects, thereby enhancing network coordination. It uses the case of local fracking policy networks in the US. Draw…
When boards connect during challenging times
Political science (10 works) · Public relations (8 works) · Business (7 works) · Public Policy and Administration Research (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Economics (4 works) · Marketing (4 works)