Matthew Gerber
Biographic Data
| ID | 3911050 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Matthew Gerber |
| GIVEN NAMES | Matthew |
| FAMILY NAME | Gerber |
| SIGNATURE | GERBER M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Colorado System |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Race, empiétement de propriété et compétence juridictionnelle dans le monde atlantique français du XVIII e siècle
En 1774, Angélique Hossé soumet une requête auprès du Conseil privé pour casser un arrêté administratif ayant autorisé ses voisins à construire un chemin d'accès privé traversant sa plantation de café. Ce conflit engageait-il réellement une question de race ? Hossé, la mère du futur « quarteron » révolutionnaire Vincent Ogé, ne fait référence ni à sa couleur de peau ni à sa généalogie dans sa pétition. Elle se désigne uniquement comme veuve. Au c…
Des “arrests parlans”
Des “arrests parlans”: Les arrêts notables à la Renaissance entre droit et littérature. Géraldine Cazals and Stéphan Geonget, eds. Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 534. Geneva: Droz, 2014. 268 pp. $61.92. - Volume 70 Issue 1
Bastardy, Race, and Law in the Eighteenth-Century French Atlantic
This article examines two transatlantic lawsuits, Jamet v. Guerre (1772) and Raymond v. Casse (1779), both of which put concepts of illegitimacy and race simultaneously into question. Contextualizing the lawsuits within the distinctive but highly pluralistic legal cultures of the colonies and the métropole, the article argues that these cases of litigation reveal some of the processes by which new conceptions of illegitimacy and race were initial…
BastardsPolitics, Family, and Law in Early Modern France
Tracing the historical evolution of legal debates over the rights and disabilities of children born out of wedlock in early modern France, this text offers a political history of the family from the oblique perspective of those who were theoretically excluded from it.
Semantic Role Labeling of Implicit Arguments for Nominal Predicates
Nominal predicates often carry implicit arguments. Recent work on semantic role labeling has focused on identifying arguments within the local context of a predicate; implicit arguments, however, have not been systematically examined. To address this limitation, we have manually annotated a corpus of implicit arguments for ten predicates from NomBank. Through analysis of this corpus, we find that implicit arguments add 71% to the argument structu…
Family, the State, and Law in Early Modern and Revolutionary France
Over the past two decades, feminist historians of early modern and revolutionary France have succeeded in pushing the history of the family in a political direction. They have achieved this not only by highlighting the centrality of the family to early modern and revolutionary political culture, but also by elucidating the ways that families and the state have reshaped one another over time through the medium of law and legal culture. Although th…
Bastardy, Race, and Law in the Eighteenth-Century French Atlantic
This article examines two transatlantic lawsuits, Jamet v. Guerre (1772) and Raymond v. Casse (1779), both of which put concepts of illegitimacy and race simultaneously into question. Contextualizing the lawsuits within the distinctive but highly pluralistic legal cultures of the colonies and the métropole, the article argues that these cases of litigation reveal some of the processes by which new conceptions of illegitimacy and race were initial…
Race, empiétement de propriété et compétence juridictionnelle dans le monde atlantique français du XVIII e siècle
En 1774, Angélique Hossé soumet une requête auprès du Conseil privé pour casser un arrêté administratif ayant autorisé ses voisins à construire un chemin d'accès privé traversant sa plantation de café. Ce conflit engageait-il réellement une question de race ? Hossé, la mère du futur « quarteron » révolutionnaire Vincent Ogé, ne fait référence ni à sa couleur de peau ni à sa généalogie dans sa pétition. Elle se désigne uniquement comme veuve. Au c…
Family, the State, and Law in Early Modern and Revolutionary France
Over the past two decades, feminist historians of early modern and revolutionary France have succeeded in pushing the history of the family in a political direction. They have achieved this not only by highlighting the centrality of the family to early modern and revolutionary political culture, but also by elucidating the ways that families and the state have reshaped one another over time through the medium of law and legal culture. Although th…
Family, the State, and Law in Early Modern and Revolutionary France
Over the past two decades, feminist historians of early modern and revolutionary France have succeeded in pushing the history of the family in a political direction. They have achieved this not only by highlighting the centrality of the family to early modern and revolutionary political culture, but also by elucidating the ways that families and the state have reshaped one another over time through the medium of law and legal culture. Although th…
BastardsPolitics, Family, and Law in Early Modern France
Tracing the historical evolution of legal debates over the rights and disabilities of children born out of wedlock in early modern France, this text offers a political history of the family from the oblique perspective of those who were theoretically excluded from it.
Semantic Role Labeling of Implicit Arguments for Nominal Predicates
Nominal predicates often carry implicit arguments. Recent work on semantic role labeling has focused on identifying arguments within the local context of a predicate; implicit arguments, however, have not been systematically examined. To address this limitation, we have manually annotated a corpus of implicit arguments for ten predicates from NomBank. Through analysis of this corpus, we find that implicit arguments add 71% to the argument structu…
Bastardy, Race, and Law in the Eighteenth-Century French Atlantic
This article examines two transatlantic lawsuits, Jamet v. Guerre (1772) and Raymond v. Casse (1779), both of which put concepts of illegitimacy and race simultaneously into question. Contextualizing the lawsuits within the distinctive but highly pluralistic legal cultures of the colonies and the métropole, the article argues that these cases of litigation reveal some of the processes by which new conceptions of illegitimacy and race were initial…
Des “arrests parlans”
Des “arrests parlans”: Les arrêts notables à la Renaissance entre droit et littérature. Géraldine Cazals and Stéphan Geonget, eds. Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 534. Geneva: Droz, 2014. 268 pp. $61.92. - Volume 70 Issue 1
Race, empiétement de propriété et compétence juridictionnelle dans le monde atlantique français du XVIII e siècle
En 1774, Angélique Hossé soumet une requête auprès du Conseil privé pour casser un arrêté administratif ayant autorisé ses voisins à construire un chemin d'accès privé traversant sa plantation de café. Ce conflit engageait-il réellement une question de race ? Hossé, la mère du futur « quarteron » révolutionnaire Vincent Ogé, ne fait référence ni à sa couleur de peau ni à sa généalogie dans sa pétition. Elle se désigne uniquement comme veuve. Au c…
European Political History Analysis (4 works) · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Art (3 works) · Humanities (3 works) · Law (3 works) · History (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medieval and Early Modern Justice (2 works)