John F Forbes
Biographic Data
| ID | 3933606 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John F Forbes |
| GIVEN NAMES | John F |
| FAMILY NAME | Forbes |
| SIGNATURE | FORBES J F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Social Paediatric and Obstetric Research Unit University of Glasgow—Scotland |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1980 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1988 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Development of a Neonatal Case-mix Classification
This article introduces a neonatal classification based on latent class analysis. The neonatal classification generates five distinct classes ranging from the normal-birth-weight, full-term, healthy baby to the low-birth-weight preterm infant with many life-threatening problems. Unlike several suggested neonatal classifications, latent class analysis accommodates the range and severity of illness typically encountered in neonatal populations. It …
Economic aspects of health education
Population Economics: A Survey of Recent Research
Burden Sharing, Strategy, and the Design of Nato
This study shows that recent technological advancements in weapons, the policy of detente, and the strategic reorientation of NATO are increasing the relative importance of damage-limiting weapons. The resulting increases in excludable benefits and common-interest awareness permit NATO allies to share defense burdens more efficiently via markets according to benefits received than was the case in the 1960s. The statistical results support our hyp…
In Defense of a Collective Goods Theory of Alliances
This article defends the collective goods theory of alliances by showing that club theory is an appropriate tool for analyzing allocative issues of alliances from a positive prospective. The article concludes with a demonstration that Oppenheimer made an analytical mistake when he questioned the normative importance of Pareto optimality
In Defense of a Collective Goods Theory of Alliances
This article defends the collective goods theory of alliances by showing that club theory is an appropriate tool for analyzing allocative issues of alliances from a positive prospective. The article concludes with a demonstration that Oppenheimer made an analytical mistake when he questioned the normative importance of Pareto optimality
Economic aspects of health education
Burden Sharing, Strategy, and the Design of Nato
This study shows that recent technological advancements in weapons, the policy of detente, and the strategic reorientation of NATO are increasing the relative importance of damage-limiting weapons. The resulting increases in excludable benefits and common-interest awareness permit NATO allies to share defense burdens more efficiently via markets according to benefits received than was the case in the 1960s. The statistical results support our hyp…
In Defense of a Collective Goods Theory of Alliances
This article defends the collective goods theory of alliances by showing that club theory is an appropriate tool for analyzing allocative issues of alliances from a positive prospective. The article concludes with a demonstration that Oppenheimer made an analytical mistake when he questioned the normative importance of Pareto optimality
Population Economics: A Survey of Recent Research
Economic aspects of health education
Development of a Neonatal Case-mix Classification
This article introduces a neonatal classification based on latent class analysis. The neonatal classification generates five distinct classes ranging from the normal-birth-weight, full-term, healthy baby to the low-birth-weight preterm infant with many life-threatening problems. Unlike several suggested neonatal classifications, latent class analysis accommodates the range and severity of illness typically encountered in neonatal populations. It …
Computer Science (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (2 works) · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Agricultural economics (1 works) · Allocative efficiency (1 works)