Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jeffrey Seidman

Biographic Data

ID3974021
NAMEJeffrey Seidman
GIVEN NAMESJeffrey
FAMILY NAMESeidman
SIGNATURESEIDMAN J
AFFILIATIONSVassar College
ORCID0000-0002-9415-1840
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS6
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX1
  • Respect for Nature, Respect for Persons, Respect for Value

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Philosophy•2022

    I elucidate a frame of mind that David Wiggins calls respect for nature , which he understands as a special attitude toward a sui generis object, Nature as such . A person with this frame of mind takes nature to impose defeasible limits on her action, so that there are some courses of action that she will refuse even to entertain, except in circumstances of dire exigency. I defend the reasonableness of respect for nature, drawing upon considerati…

  • Reasons Not to Consider Our Options

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Journal of the American…•2020

    I argue that a practical deliberator may have good reasons not to consider some option even though that option is what there is most reason, all things considered, for her to do. The most interesting reasons not to consider an option arise in cases where an agent cannot be compensated in kind for the loss of goods that she values. Where this is the case, an attitude of conservatism is warranted: it is reasonable to begin deliberation by consideri…

  • Caring and the Boundary-Driven Structure of Practical Deliberation

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2009

    When a reasonable agent deliberates about what to do, she entertains only a limited range of possible courses of action. A theory of practical reasoning must therefore include an account of deliberative attention: an account that both explains the patterns of deliberative attention that reasonable agents typically display and allows us to see why these patterns of deliberative attention are reasonable. I offer such an account, built around two, c…

  • Valuing and Caring

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    What is it to “value” something, in the semi‐technical sense of the term that Gary Watson establishes? I argue that valuing something consists in caring about it. Caring involves not only emotional dispositions of the sort that Agnieszka Jaworska has elaborated, but also a distinctive cognitive disposition – namely, a (defeasible) disposition to believe the object cared about to be a source of agent‐relative reasons for action and for emotion. Un…

  • Two Sides of 'Silencing

    Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    John McDowell argues that for virtuous agents the requirements of virtue do not outweigh competing considerations, but 'silence' them. He explains this claim in two different ways: a virtuous agent (a) will not be temptedto act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('motivational silencing'), or (b) will not believe that he has any reason to act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('rational silencing'). I identify a small class of ca…

  • Valuing and Caring

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    What is it to “value” something, in the semi‐technical sense of the term that Gary Watson establishes? I argue that valuing something consists in caring about it. Caring involves not only emotional dispositions of the sort that Agnieszka Jaworska has elaborated, but also a distinctive cognitive disposition – namely, a (defeasible) disposition to believe the object cared about to be a source of agent‐relative reasons for action and for emotion. Un…

  • Two Sides of 'Silencing

    Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    John McDowell argues that for virtuous agents the requirements of virtue do not outweigh competing considerations, but 'silence' them. He explains this claim in two different ways: a virtuous agent (a) will not be temptedto act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('motivational silencing'), or (b) will not believe that he has any reason to act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('rational silencing'). I identify a small class of ca…

  • Two Sides of 'Silencing

    Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 1

    John McDowell argues that for virtuous agents the requirements of virtue do not outweigh competing considerations, but 'silence' them. He explains this claim in two different ways: a virtuous agent (a) will not be temptedto act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('motivational silencing'), or (b) will not believe that he has any reason to act in a way which is incompatible with virtue ('rational silencing'). I identify a small class of ca…

  • Caring and the Boundary-Driven Structure of Practical Deliberation

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2009

    When a reasonable agent deliberates about what to do, she entertains only a limited range of possible courses of action. A theory of practical reasoning must therefore include an account of deliberative attention: an account that both explains the patterns of deliberative attention that reasonable agents typically display and allows us to see why these patterns of deliberative attention are reasonable. I offer such an account, built around two, c…

  • Valuing and Caring

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    What is it to “value” something, in the semi‐technical sense of the term that Gary Watson establishes? I argue that valuing something consists in caring about it. Caring involves not only emotional dispositions of the sort that Agnieszka Jaworska has elaborated, but also a distinctive cognitive disposition – namely, a (defeasible) disposition to believe the object cared about to be a source of agent‐relative reasons for action and for emotion. Un…

  • Reasons Not to Consider Our Options

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Journal of the American…•2020

    I argue that a practical deliberator may have good reasons not to consider some option even though that option is what there is most reason, all things considered, for her to do. The most interesting reasons not to consider an option arise in cases where an agent cannot be compensated in kind for the loss of goods that she values. Where this is the case, an attitude of conservatism is warranted: it is reasonable to begin deliberation by consideri…

  • Respect for Nature, Respect for Persons, Respect for Value

    Open Access•Jeffrey Seidman•ARTICLE•Philosophy•2022

    I elucidate a frame of mind that David Wiggins calls respect for nature , which he understands as a special attitude toward a sui generis object, Nature as such . A person with this frame of mind takes nature to impose defeasible limits on her action, so that there are some courses of action that she will refuse even to entertain, except in circumstances of dire exigency. I defend the reasonableness of respect for nature, drawing upon considerati…

Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 works) · Deliberation (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Defeasible estate (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae