Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Eva Mol

Biographic Data

ID4071695
NAMEEva Mol
GIVEN NAMESEva
FAMILY NAMEMol
SIGNATUREMOL E
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of York
ORCID0000-0003-4490-9155
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • These Words Are My Own: Archaeological Theory in Dialect

    Open Access•Judith M López Aceves, Brodhie M I Molloy et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2026•References: 27

    English is the lingua franca not only for academia but also for almost all international infrastructures and global communications. It comes as no surprise, then, that the dominant and assumed normative voice in archaeology is standard British English (SBE) for narratives of various times and places. This language is ‘majoritarian’—by this we do not mean that it is spoken by most of humanity, but that it is the imposed ‘ideal’ others are measured…

  • New Materialism and Posthumanism in Roman Archaeology: When Objects Speak for Others

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2023•Cited by: 5•References: 58

    Theories derived from the ontological, posthumanist, or the new materialist turn have been increasingly employed in various fields within archaeology in the past decade. Recently, Roman archaeology also picked up on these theories: however, critical integration as well as more theoretical refinement is necessary to show the real potential of such theories. New materialism is not about writing a ‘history of objects’, but about a better ontological…

  • Trying to Hear with the Eyes: Slow Looking and Ontological Difference in Archaeological Object Analysis

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2021•References: 43

    This article presents an alternative to archaeological object observation through an exercise in alterity and slow looking. It is inspired by the movement of Slow Archaeology, and based on the art of slow looking, perspectivism, and 16th century Japanese object aesthetics in the context of the Japanese tea ceremony. The exercise experiments with different vantage points, embodiment, and empathy related to theories of the ontological turn and non-…

  • Roman Cyborgs! On Significant Otherness, Material Absence, and Virtual Presence in the Archaeology of Roman Religion

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•European Journal of Archaeology•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this article I explore different ways archaeologists can contribute to and learn from theorizing the digital world beyond the traditional functionalistic means of applying computational methods. I argue that current digital technologies can be a very constructive tool to create non-human experience and awareness. I pursue this argument by presenting ideas from a work-in-progress project experimenting with the post-human and the virtual, and by…

  • The Perception of Egypt in Networks of Being and Becoming: A Thing Theory Approach to Egyptianising Objects in Roman Domestic Contexts

    Open Access•Eva Mol, Eva M Mol•ARTICLE•Theoretical Roman Archaeology…•2013

  • New Materialism and Posthumanism in Roman Archaeology: When Objects Speak for Others

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2023•Cited by: 5•References: 58

    Theories derived from the ontological, posthumanist, or the new materialist turn have been increasingly employed in various fields within archaeology in the past decade. Recently, Roman archaeology also picked up on these theories: however, critical integration as well as more theoretical refinement is necessary to show the real potential of such theories. New materialism is not about writing a ‘history of objects’, but about a better ontological…

  • Roman Cyborgs! On Significant Otherness, Material Absence, and Virtual Presence in the Archaeology of Roman Religion

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•European Journal of Archaeology•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this article I explore different ways archaeologists can contribute to and learn from theorizing the digital world beyond the traditional functionalistic means of applying computational methods. I argue that current digital technologies can be a very constructive tool to create non-human experience and awareness. I pursue this argument by presenting ideas from a work-in-progress project experimenting with the post-human and the virtual, and by…

  • The Perception of Egypt in Networks of Being and Becoming: A Thing Theory Approach to Egyptianising Objects in Roman Domestic Contexts

    Open Access•Eva Mol, Eva M Mol•ARTICLE•Theoretical Roman Archaeology…•2013

  • Roman Cyborgs! On Significant Otherness, Material Absence, and Virtual Presence in the Archaeology of Roman Religion

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•European Journal of Archaeology•2019•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this article I explore different ways archaeologists can contribute to and learn from theorizing the digital world beyond the traditional functionalistic means of applying computational methods. I argue that current digital technologies can be a very constructive tool to create non-human experience and awareness. I pursue this argument by presenting ideas from a work-in-progress project experimenting with the post-human and the virtual, and by…

  • Trying to Hear with the Eyes: Slow Looking and Ontological Difference in Archaeological Object Analysis

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2021•References: 43

    This article presents an alternative to archaeological object observation through an exercise in alterity and slow looking. It is inspired by the movement of Slow Archaeology, and based on the art of slow looking, perspectivism, and 16th century Japanese object aesthetics in the context of the Japanese tea ceremony. The exercise experiments with different vantage points, embodiment, and empathy related to theories of the ontological turn and non-…

  • New Materialism and Posthumanism in Roman Archaeology: When Objects Speak for Others

    Open Access•Eva Mol•ARTICLE•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2023•Cited by: 5•References: 58

    Theories derived from the ontological, posthumanist, or the new materialist turn have been increasingly employed in various fields within archaeology in the past decade. Recently, Roman archaeology also picked up on these theories: however, critical integration as well as more theoretical refinement is necessary to show the real potential of such theories. New materialism is not about writing a ‘history of objects’, but about a better ontological…

  • These Words Are My Own: Archaeological Theory in Dialect

    Open Access•Judith M López Aceves, Brodhie M I Molloy et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2026•References: 27

    English is the lingua franca not only for academia but also for almost all international infrastructures and global communications. It comes as no surprise, then, that the dominant and assumed normative voice in archaeology is standard British English (SBE) for narratives of various times and places. This language is ‘majoritarian’—by this we do not mean that it is spoken by most of humanity, but that it is the imposed ‘ideal’ others are measured…

Philosophy (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · History (3 works) · Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 works) · Archaeology (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Perception (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae