Guido Ropers
Biographic Data
| ID | 4122482 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Guido Ropers |
| GIVEN NAMES | Guido |
| FAMILY NAME | Ropers |
| SIGNATURE | ROPERS G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Mannheim |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5069-2699 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
How Gendered Is the Peer-Review Process? A Mixed-Design Analysis of Reviewer Feedback
A fair peer-review process is essential for the integrity of a discipline’s scholarly standards. However, underrepresentation of scholarly groups casts doubt on fairness, which currently is raising concerns about a gender bias in the peer-review process of premier scholarly journals such as the American Political Science Review ( APSR ). This study examines gender differences in APSR reviewing during the period 2007–2020. Our explorative analysis…
Comparative politics and causal evaluation of structural reforms
In comparative studies, causal evaluations attempt to improve our understanding of the effectiveness of structural reforms by counterfactually inspecting post-treatment effects. Yet, even if comparative scholars find similar treatment and comparison units, the interpretation of the post-treatment trajectory is difficult as short-term estimates can be subject to strategic timing of reform implementation, while long-term effects are likely affected…
How Gendered Is the Peer-Review Process? A Mixed-Design Analysis of Reviewer Feedback
A fair peer-review process is essential for the integrity of a discipline’s scholarly standards. However, underrepresentation of scholarly groups casts doubt on fairness, which currently is raising concerns about a gender bias in the peer-review process of premier scholarly journals such as the American Political Science Review ( APSR ). This study examines gender differences in APSR reviewing during the period 2007–2020. Our explorative analysis…
Comparative politics and causal evaluation of structural reforms
In comparative studies, causal evaluations attempt to improve our understanding of the effectiveness of structural reforms by counterfactually inspecting post-treatment effects. Yet, even if comparative scholars find similar treatment and comparison units, the interpretation of the post-treatment trajectory is difficult as short-term estimates can be subject to strategic timing of reform implementation, while long-term effects are likely affected…
Comparative politics and causal evaluation of structural reforms
In comparative studies, causal evaluations attempt to improve our understanding of the effectiveness of structural reforms by counterfactually inspecting post-treatment effects. Yet, even if comparative scholars find similar treatment and comparison units, the interpretation of the post-treatment trajectory is difficult as short-term estimates can be subject to strategic timing of reform implementation, while long-term effects are likely affected…
How Gendered Is the Peer-Review Process? A Mixed-Design Analysis of Reviewer Feedback
A fair peer-review process is essential for the integrity of a discipline’s scholarly standards. However, underrepresentation of scholarly groups casts doubt on fairness, which currently is raising concerns about a gender bias in the peer-review process of premier scholarly journals such as the American Political Science Review ( APSR ). This study examines gender differences in APSR reviewing during the period 2007–2020. Our explorative analysis…
Computer Science (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 work) · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1 work) · Causal inference (1 work) · Confounding (1 work) · Demographic economics (1 work) · Econometrics (1 work) · Economics (1 work)