Mark D Cunningham
Biographic Data
| ID | 4126489 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mark D Cunningham |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mark D |
| FAMILY NAME | Cunningham |
| SIGNATURE | CUNNINGHAM M D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Seattle University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0986-9752 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 38 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Death is different: Reply to Olver et al. (2020)
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence
Wasted resources and gratuitous suffering: The failure of a security rationale for death row
Sentencing Determinations in Death Penalty Cases
Mental health professionals may be called upon in capital sentencing or appellate review to provide case-specific and/or scientific perspectives regarding factors that may be considered mitigating, the defendant's risk of serious violence in the future, and/or whether the defendant is a person with mental retardation. Subsequently, mental health professionals may be called upon to evaluate competency to waive appeals and competence for execution.…
Serious assaults on prison staff: A descriptive analysis
Inmate homicides: Killers, victims, motives, and circumstances
Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence
The U.S. Supreme Court in Jurek v. Texas (1976) affirmed that capital juries are able to identify those capital offenders who will commit serious violence in the future. The capability of capital juries to accurately make these judgments as a means of deciding which capital offenders should receive the death penalty has been widely endorsed in both statute and case law, as well as embraced by jurors. A growing body of research on rates and correl…
Predictive Factors for Violent Misconduct in Close Custody
A retrospective review was conducted of the 2003 disciplinary records of close-custody inmates ( N = 24,514) in the Florida Department of Corrections. The frequency of various forms of violent misconduct was inversely related to the severity of this prison violence. A logistic regression analysis controlling for other factors demonstrated that younger age, shorter sentence, prison gang affiliation, prior prison violence, and prior prison term wer…
Operationalizing risk: The influence of measurement choice on the prevalence and correlates of prison violence among incarcerated murderers
Dangerousness and death: A nexus in search of science and reason
An assertion that a capital offender will engage in future acts of criminal violence is a factor in determining "death worthiness" in many jurisdictions of the United States. The legislative conception and court affirmation of this issue as a capital consideration were products of the parole policy and prison capability of an earlier era as well as of the limitations of risk assessment methodology and findings at that time. The intuitive assumpti…
Serious assaults on prison staff: A descriptive analysis
Inmate homicides: Killers, victims, motives, and circumstances
Dangerousness and death: A nexus in search of science and reason
An assertion that a capital offender will engage in future acts of criminal violence is a factor in determining "death worthiness" in many jurisdictions of the United States. The legislative conception and court affirmation of this issue as a capital consideration were products of the parole policy and prison capability of an earlier era as well as of the limitations of risk assessment methodology and findings at that time. The intuitive assumpti…
Operationalizing risk: The influence of measurement choice on the prevalence and correlates of prison violence among incarcerated murderers
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence
Wasted resources and gratuitous suffering: The failure of a security rationale for death row
Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence
The U.S. Supreme Court in Jurek v. Texas (1976) affirmed that capital juries are able to identify those capital offenders who will commit serious violence in the future. The capability of capital juries to accurately make these judgments as a means of deciding which capital offenders should receive the death penalty has been widely endorsed in both statute and case law, as well as embraced by jurors. A growing body of research on rates and correl…
Dangerousness and death: A nexus in search of science and reason
An assertion that a capital offender will engage in future acts of criminal violence is a factor in determining "death worthiness" in many jurisdictions of the United States. The legislative conception and court affirmation of this issue as a capital consideration were products of the parole policy and prison capability of an earlier era as well as of the limitations of risk assessment methodology and findings at that time. The intuitive assumpti…
Predictive Factors for Violent Misconduct in Close Custody
A retrospective review was conducted of the 2003 disciplinary records of close-custody inmates ( N = 24,514) in the Florida Department of Corrections. The frequency of various forms of violent misconduct was inversely related to the severity of this prison violence. A logistic regression analysis controlling for other factors demonstrated that younger age, shorter sentence, prison gang affiliation, prior prison violence, and prior prison term wer…
Operationalizing risk: The influence of measurement choice on the prevalence and correlates of prison violence among incarcerated murderers
Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence
The U.S. Supreme Court in Jurek v. Texas (1976) affirmed that capital juries are able to identify those capital offenders who will commit serious violence in the future. The capability of capital juries to accurately make these judgments as a means of deciding which capital offenders should receive the death penalty has been widely endorsed in both statute and case law, as well as embraced by jurors. A growing body of research on rates and correl…
Inmate homicides: Killers, victims, motives, and circumstances
Serious assaults on prison staff: A descriptive analysis
Sentencing Determinations in Death Penalty Cases
Mental health professionals may be called upon in capital sentencing or appellate review to provide case-specific and/or scientific perspectives regarding factors that may be considered mitigating, the defendant's risk of serious violence in the future, and/or whether the defendant is a person with mental retardation. Subsequently, mental health professionals may be called upon to evaluate competency to waive appeals and competence for execution.…
Wasted resources and gratuitous suffering: The failure of a security rationale for death row
Death is different: Reply to Olver et al. (2020)
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence
Psychology (9 works) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 works) · Criminology (8 works) · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 works) · Political science (6 works) · Medical emergency (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Poison control (5 works) · Prison (5 works) · Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 works)