Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dangerousness and death

A nexus in search of science and reason

Bibliographic Data

ID8717040
AuthorsMark D Cunningham (0000-0002-0986-9752, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume61
Issue8
Pages828-839
Publication date2006-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/0003-066x.61.8.828
PMID17115827
OpenAlexW2061322634
LanguageEN
Citations received9

An assertion that a capital offender will engage in future acts of criminal violence is a factor in determining "death worthiness" in many jurisdictions of the United States. The legislative conception and court affirmation of this issue as a capital consideration were products of the parole policy and prison capability of an earlier era as well as of the limitations of risk assessment methodology and findings at that time. The intuitive assumptions that support assertions of future dangerousness as a death penalty issue have been rendered irrelevant by changing prison conditions and parole policies or have been refuted by current findings. This raises important questions for a reasoned public policy in capital sentencing. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Assertion · Capital (architecture · Criminology · Economics · Legislature · Nexus (standard · Political science · Positive economics · Prison · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Psychology · History · Law · Social Psychology

  • Sentencing Determinations in Death Penalty Cases

    Open Access•Mark D Cunningham, Alan M Goldstein•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Assessing symptom exaggeration of psychopathology in incarcerated individuals and mentally ill offenders within forensic contexts

    Open Access•Natthawut Arin, Jiraporn Mengchuay•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2023

  • Use of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in Legal Contexts

    David Dematteo, Mark E Olver•Journal of Personality Assessment•2022

  • Death Penalty Abolition, the Right to Life, and Necessity

    Open Access•Ben Jones•Human Rights Review•2022

  • Mental health mitigating evidence and judicial outcomes for federal capital defendants

    Open Access•Shana D Stite, Katherine K Dahlsgaard•International journal of law,…•2015

  • Capital jury decision-making

    Mark D Cunningham, Jon R Sorensen et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2009

  • Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence

    David Dematteo, Stephen D Hart et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2020

  • Inmate homicides

    Open Access•Mark D Cunningham, Jon R Sorensen et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2010

  • Operationalizing risk

    Open Access•Jon R Sorensen, Mark D Cunningham•Journal of Criminal Justice•2007

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,47
Citation span2007 - 2023 (17)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae