Bradley S Chilton
Biographic Data
| ID | 4128122 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Bradley S Chilton |
| GIVEN NAMES | Bradley S |
| FAMILY NAME | Chilton |
| SIGNATURE | CHILTON B S |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Texas at El Paso |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Constitutional Conscience and Plural Ethical Directionality
From the landmark work by John Rohr, Ethics for Bureaucrats, the authors seek to take a step in furthering moral readings of the Supreme Court for public administrators. While Rohr and the Constitutional School brought in constitutional case-law study, it doesn’t seem to promote ethical reflection and has little impact on the growing crisis of ethics in public service. The paper posits a more systematic moral reading of constitutional law, develo…
Moral Readings of the Court
What moral readings characterize contemporary U.S. Supreme Court opinions on discrimination by race; ethnicity; religion; gender; sexuality; and disabilities? John Rohr and the Constitutional School of Public Administration scholars have analyzed the Supreme Court’s decisions for moral insights in public affairs. The authors sought to take a modest step with analysis based on a more nuanced, empirical moral reading of the Court’s cases. First, th…
The Court Versus Consent Decrees? Schools, Horne v. Flores and Judicial Strategies of Institutional Reform Litigation
Is the U.S. Supreme Court inviting litigants to take aim at unraveling injunctions in institutional reform litigation—especially consent decrees in the schools? In Horne v. Flores (2009), the court remanded a 17-year-old school reform case to a federal judge with orders to look beyond consent decrees on financing, reducing class sizes, and moving from bilingual education to structured English immersion—to look anew at whether the schools in Nogal…
Reflections on Defining the Public Interest
The definition and nature of the public interest is an ongoing area of debate and controversy among public administration scholars and practitioners. This article’s main thesis is that there exists an identifiable public interest entailing both normative and pragmatic elements that should be a foundational concern of every practicing public administrator. The administrator’s duty entails three factors: (a) the fiduciary duties to the commons as d…
Reflections on Defining the Public Interest
The definition and nature of the public interest is an ongoing area of debate and controversy among public administration scholars and practitioners. This article’s main thesis is that there exists an identifiable public interest entailing both normative and pragmatic elements that should be a foundational concern of every practicing public administrator. The administrator’s duty entails three factors: (a) the fiduciary duties to the commons as d…
Moral Readings of the Court
What moral readings characterize contemporary U.S. Supreme Court opinions on discrimination by race; ethnicity; religion; gender; sexuality; and disabilities? John Rohr and the Constitutional School of Public Administration scholars have analyzed the Supreme Court’s decisions for moral insights in public affairs. The authors sought to take a modest step with analysis based on a more nuanced, empirical moral reading of the Court’s cases. First, th…
Reflections on Defining the Public Interest
The definition and nature of the public interest is an ongoing area of debate and controversy among public administration scholars and practitioners. This article’s main thesis is that there exists an identifiable public interest entailing both normative and pragmatic elements that should be a foundational concern of every practicing public administrator. The administrator’s duty entails three factors: (a) the fiduciary duties to the commons as d…
The Court Versus Consent Decrees? Schools, Horne v. Flores and Judicial Strategies of Institutional Reform Litigation
Is the U.S. Supreme Court inviting litigants to take aim at unraveling injunctions in institutional reform litigation—especially consent decrees in the schools? In Horne v. Flores (2009), the court remanded a 17-year-old school reform case to a federal judge with orders to look beyond consent decrees on financing, reducing class sizes, and moving from bilingual education to structured English immersion—to look anew at whether the schools in Nogal…
Moral Readings of the Court
What moral readings characterize contemporary U.S. Supreme Court opinions on discrimination by race; ethnicity; religion; gender; sexuality; and disabilities? John Rohr and the Constitutional School of Public Administration scholars have analyzed the Supreme Court’s decisions for moral insights in public affairs. The authors sought to take a modest step with analysis based on a more nuanced, empirical moral reading of the Court’s cases. First, th…
Constitutional Conscience and Plural Ethical Directionality
From the landmark work by John Rohr, Ethics for Bureaucrats, the authors seek to take a step in furthering moral readings of the Supreme Court for public administrators. While Rohr and the Constitutional School brought in constitutional case-law study, it doesn’t seem to promote ethical reflection and has little impact on the growing crisis of ethics in public service. The paper posits a more systematic moral reading of constitutional law, develo…
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Supreme court (3 works) · Deontological ethics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 works) · Teleology (2 works)