Daniel H Deudney
Biographic Data
| ID | 4134588 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daniel H Deudney |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daniel H |
| FAMILY NAME | Deudney |
| SIGNATURE | DEUDNEY D H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Johns Hopkins University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 148 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Going critical: Toward a modified nuclear one worldism
Nuclear weapons posed a profound conceptual problem for classical realism, forcing into collision two of its long-standing core dictums: oppose world government as a source of insecurity and un-freedom, and exit anarchy into authoritative government when levels of violence interdependence in particular spaces become very high. Initially, leading realists (Burnham, Morgenthau, and Herz) chose world government, hoping internal restraints (analogous…
Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village
Realism, the dominant theory of international relations, particularly regarding security, seems compelling in part because of its claim to embody so much of Western political thought from the ancient Greeks to the present. Its main challenger, liberalism, looks to Kant and nineteenth-century economists. Despite their many insights, neither realism nor liberalism gives us adequate tools to grapple with security globalization, the liberal ascent, a…
Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts
(2000). Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-42
The Philadelphian system: Sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary …
Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village
Realism, the dominant theory of international relations, particularly regarding security, seems compelling in part because of its claim to embody so much of Western political thought from the ancient Greeks to the present. Its main challenger, liberalism, looks to Kant and nineteenth-century economists. Despite their many insights, neither realism nor liberalism gives us adequate tools to grapple with security globalization, the liberal ascent, a…
The Philadelphian system: Sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary …
Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts
(2000). Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-42
Going critical: Toward a modified nuclear one worldism
Nuclear weapons posed a profound conceptual problem for classical realism, forcing into collision two of its long-standing core dictums: oppose world government as a source of insecurity and un-freedom, and exit anarchy into authoritative government when levels of violence interdependence in particular spaces become very high. Initially, leading realists (Burnham, Morgenthau, and Herz) chose world government, hoping internal restraints (analogous…
The Philadelphian system: Sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary …
Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts
(2000). Regrounding realism: Anarchy, security, and changing material contexts. Security Studies: Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-42
Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village
Realism, the dominant theory of international relations, particularly regarding security, seems compelling in part because of its claim to embody so much of Western political thought from the ancient Greeks to the present. Its main challenger, liberalism, looks to Kant and nineteenth-century economists. Despite their many insights, neither realism nor liberalism gives us adequate tools to grapple with security globalization, the liberal ascent, a…
Going critical: Toward a modified nuclear one worldism
Nuclear weapons posed a profound conceptual problem for classical realism, forcing into collision two of its long-standing core dictums: oppose world government as a source of insecurity and un-freedom, and exit anarchy into authoritative government when levels of violence interdependence in particular spaces become very high. Initially, leading realists (Burnham, Morgenthau, and Herz) chose world government, hoping internal restraints (analogous…
International Relations and Foreign Policy (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Political economy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Politics (2 works)