Going critical
Toward a modified nuclear one worldism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12923397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Deudney (Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Daniel H Deudney (Johns Hopkins University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 367-385 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1755088218796689 |
| OpenAlex | W2890848814 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
Nuclear weapons posed a profound conceptual problem for classical realism, forcing into collision two of its long-standing core dictums: oppose world government as a source of insecurity and un-freedom, and exit anarchy into authoritative government when levels of violence interdependence in particular spaces become very high. Initially, leading realists (Burnham, Morgenthau, and Herz) chose world government, hoping internal restraints (analogous to the role played by the balance of power in anarchies with lesser levels of violence interdependence) could overcome its threat to freedom and its political impracticality. But this option reached a conceptual and practical dead end. Building on Herz’s suggestion of a generalized historical materialist base-superstructural model to theorize security practices and orders, the actual materiality of the nuclear situation (previously dimly understood) points toward the obsolescence of the statist mode of protection, and toward arms control, as the practices of an alternative, republican-federal, mode of protection whose operation gradually moves world order from anarchy, but not toward a world state. Until this shift is complete, world order remains in fundamental contradiction with the nuclear forces of destruction
Contradiction · Epistemology · Law and economics · Nuclear ethics · Nuclear weapon · Obsolescence · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
The Humble Cosmopolitan
Global International Relations and Indian Visions of World Government
Firearms analogies and settler colonialism in US nuclear deterrence strategy
International Politics in the Age of Existential Threats
Macrosecuritisation failure and technological lock-in
Addressing Humanity’s failure to establish Existential Security
Last things
The illogic of American nuclear strategy
By the bomb's early light
On Active Service in Peace and War
Bounding Power
The Limits of Safety
New Thinking in International Relations Theory
Glimmer of a New Leviathan
The (classical) Realist vision of global reform
The Realist Case for Global Reform
Containment or Liberation
The Nuclear Turning Point
Alternatives to Anarchy
Scientific Man vs. Power Politics
Foundations of the World Republic
Zero Ballistic Missiles
Hans Morgenthau and the World State
The Territorial State Revisited
Regrounding realism
Geopolitics as Theory
Guns don't kill people, cyborgs do
The Illusion of World Government
Politics Among Nations
The Four Paradoxes of Nuclear Strategy
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |