Henry Ito
Biographic Data
| ID | 4136775 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Henry Ito |
| GIVEN NAMES | Henry |
| FAMILY NAME | Ito |
| SIGNATURE | ITO H |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1980 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1981 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Academic Unions in Higher Education
In their appraisal of our 1980 article, Brown and Stone make the following claims: (1) we failed to adduce any evidence or argument suggesting that the empirical results and conclusions in their Economic Inquiry article are incorrect, (2) we failed to produce any basis for declaring their methodological criticisms of Morgan and Kearney are logically invalid, and (3) we fell prey to the post hoc ergo propter hoc argument. In this paper, we shall f…
Compensation Gains in Higher Education
The Brown and Stone sample of collective bargaining schools is redefined by selecting the collective bargaining unit (which may include several campuses under a common contract) as the unit of observation rather than the individual campus. The application of the Brown and Stone methodology to the redefined sample results in the reaffirmation of the Morgan and Kearney conclusion that collective bargaining in higher education was associated with in…
No prominent works on this page.
Compensation Gains in Higher Education
The Brown and Stone sample of collective bargaining schools is redefined by selecting the collective bargaining unit (which may include several campuses under a common contract) as the unit of observation rather than the individual campus. The application of the Brown and Stone methodology to the redefined sample results in the reaffirmation of the Morgan and Kearney conclusion that collective bargaining in higher education was associated with in…
Academic Unions in Higher Education
In their appraisal of our 1980 article, Brown and Stone make the following claims: (1) we failed to adduce any evidence or argument suggesting that the empirical results and conclusions in their Economic Inquiry article are incorrect, (2) we failed to produce any basis for declaring their methodological criticisms of Morgan and Kearney are logically invalid, and (3) we fell prey to the post hoc ergo propter hoc argument. In this paper, we shall f…
Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Accounting Education and Careers (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work) · Collective bargaining (1 work) · Compensation (psychology) (1 work) · Corporate Finance and Governance (1 work) · Criticism (1 work) · Economic Theory and Institutions (1 work)