Marianne Kristiansen
Biographic Data
| ID | 4145169 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marianne Kristiansen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marianne |
| FAMILY NAME | Kristiansen |
| SIGNATURE | KRISTIANSEN M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Aalborg University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
“Action research is not only a method.” 5 questions answered by Marianne Kristiansen and Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen, authors of “Action Research in Organizations. Participation in Change Processes”
Bibliography: “Action research is not only a method.” 5 questions answered by Marianne Kristiansen and Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen, authors of “Action Research in Organizations. Participation in Change Processes”, Argentina, IJAR – International Journal of Action Research, 2-2021, pp. 189-193. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v17i2.06
Does organizational action research have a future
This is not an ordinary article. It was written in response to some questions that the current and the former IJAR editors-in-chief asked us to reflect on. We did so gratefully, because this was a good opportunity to look back on 25 years of doing AR in organisations. The article describes four challenges of future organisational action research. Firstly, in the future an increasing number of skilled employees will make it necessary to move from …
Participation and Social Engineering in Early Organizational Action Research: Lewin and the Harwood studies
This article deals with Kurt Lewin’s concepts of participation, change and action research in organisations. It presents a series of experiments conducted by some of Lewin’s former Ph.D. students from 1939 to 1946 at Harwood, a textile factory in Virginia, which contributed to early organisational action research. The article has three purposes. Firstly, it demonstrates how articipation occurred to a certain degree in the Harwood organisation whe…
Self-referentiality as a power mechanism: Towards dialogic action research
The article is a first- and second-person inquiry into power relations between action researchers and participants based on a dialogic action research project with a group of managers at Bang & Olufsen, Denmark. It focuses on discrepancies between our espoused values of dialogue and our theories-in-use characterized by self-referentiality. This concept emerged during the process and describes a non-dialogic way of transforming the perspectives of…
Self-referentiality as a power mechanism: Towards dialogic action research
The article is a first- and second-person inquiry into power relations between action researchers and participants based on a dialogic action research project with a group of managers at Bang & Olufsen, Denmark. It focuses on discrepancies between our espoused values of dialogue and our theories-in-use characterized by self-referentiality. This concept emerged during the process and describes a non-dialogic way of transforming the perspectives of…
Self-referentiality as a power mechanism: Towards dialogic action research
The article is a first- and second-person inquiry into power relations between action researchers and participants based on a dialogic action research project with a group of managers at Bang & Olufsen, Denmark. It focuses on discrepancies between our espoused values of dialogue and our theories-in-use characterized by self-referentiality. This concept emerged during the process and describes a non-dialogic way of transforming the perspectives of…
Participation and Social Engineering in Early Organizational Action Research: Lewin and the Harwood studies
This article deals with Kurt Lewin’s concepts of participation, change and action research in organisations. It presents a series of experiments conducted by some of Lewin’s former Ph.D. students from 1939 to 1946 at Harwood, a textile factory in Virginia, which contributed to early organisational action research. The article has three purposes. Firstly, it demonstrates how articipation occurred to a certain degree in the Harwood organisation whe…
Does organizational action research have a future
This is not an ordinary article. It was written in response to some questions that the current and the former IJAR editors-in-chief asked us to reflect on. We did so gratefully, because this was a good opportunity to look back on 25 years of doing AR in organisations. The article describes four challenges of future organisational action research. Firstly, in the future an increasing number of skilled employees will make it necessary to move from …
“Action research is not only a method.” 5 questions answered by Marianne Kristiansen and Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen, authors of “Action Research in Organizations. Participation in Change Processes”
Bibliography: “Action research is not only a method.” 5 questions answered by Marianne Kristiansen and Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen, authors of “Action Research in Organizations. Participation in Change Processes”, Argentina, IJAR – International Journal of Action Research, 2-2021, pp. 189-193. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v17i2.06
Action research (4 works) · Pedagogy (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Action (physics (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Engineering ethics (2 works) · Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 works)