Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kipling Williams

Biographic Data

ID4233241
NAMEKipling Williams
GIVEN NAMESKipling
FAMILY NAMEWilliams
SIGNATUREWILLIAMS K
AFFILIATIONSPurdue University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS136
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX3
  • The impact of fleeting exposure to female exemplars of success in STEM

    Open Access•Megan K Mccarty, Janice R Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Two studies tested the impact of subtle cues that associate masculinity with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) success on women’s STEM experiences. Study 1 was a field study conducted in a university campus engineering building where photos of graduating classes were displayed. In Study 2, STEM majors viewed a mock website that depicted either exclusively male or mixed-gender STEM students. Across both studies, women report…

  • New majorities’ abuse of power: Effects of perceived control and social support

    Open Access•Radmila Prislin, Vanessa Sawicki et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Two studies examined how new majorities (minorities-turned-majorities) abused power by claiming privileges (in-group favoritism) and disparaging new minorities (out-group hostility). Study 1 found that new majorities low in perceived control showed significantly more in-group favoritism than new majorities high in perceived control and stable majorities. The effect of control on new majorities’ in-group favoritism was mediated by certainty about …

  • A Little Acceptance Goes a Long Way: Applying Social Impact Theory to the Rejection–Aggression Link

    Open Access•C Nathan Dewall, J M Twenge et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2010

    Social rejection hurts, causing aggression even against innocent people. How can the sting of social rejection be reduced? Based on social impact theory, the authors predicted that aggression would decrease as a power function of the number of people accepting the participant. In Experiment 1, participants included by 0, 1, 2, or 3 players in an online ball-tossing game could aggress against an innocent stranger by requiring him or her to eat ver…

  • Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981•Cited by: 60

  • Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy

    Open Access•Stephen G Harkins, Bibb Latane et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1980•Cited by: 7•References: 6

  • Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing

    Bibb Latane, Kimberly D Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979•Cited by: 67

    Two experiments found that when asked to perform the physically exerting tasks of clapping and shouting, people exhibit a sizable decrease in individual effort when performing in groups as compared to when they perform alone. This decrease, which we call social loafing, is in addition to losses due to faulty coordination of group efforts. Social loafing is discussed in terms of its experimental generality and theoretical importance. The widesprea…

  • Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing

    Bibb Latane, Kimberly D Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979•Cited by: 67

    Two experiments found that when asked to perform the physically exerting tasks of clapping and shouting, people exhibit a sizable decrease in individual effort when performing in groups as compared to when they perform alone. This decrease, which we call social loafing, is in addition to losses due to faulty coordination of group efforts. Social loafing is discussed in terms of its experimental generality and theoretical importance. The widesprea…

  • Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981•Cited by: 60

  • Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy

    Open Access•Stephen G Harkins, Bibb Latane et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1980•Cited by: 7•References: 6

  • The impact of fleeting exposure to female exemplars of success in STEM

    Open Access•Megan K Mccarty, Janice R Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Two studies tested the impact of subtle cues that associate masculinity with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) success on women’s STEM experiences. Study 1 was a field study conducted in a university campus engineering building where photos of graduating classes were displayed. In Study 2, STEM majors viewed a mock website that depicted either exclusively male or mixed-gender STEM students. Across both studies, women report…

  • New majorities’ abuse of power: Effects of perceived control and social support

    Open Access•Radmila Prislin, Vanessa Sawicki et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Two studies examined how new majorities (minorities-turned-majorities) abused power by claiming privileges (in-group favoritism) and disparaging new minorities (out-group hostility). Study 1 found that new majorities low in perceived control showed significantly more in-group favoritism than new majorities high in perceived control and stable majorities. The effect of control on new majorities’ in-group favoritism was mediated by certainty about …

  • Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing

    Bibb Latane, Kimberly D Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979•Cited by: 67

    Two experiments found that when asked to perform the physically exerting tasks of clapping and shouting, people exhibit a sizable decrease in individual effort when performing in groups as compared to when they perform alone. This decrease, which we call social loafing, is in addition to losses due to faulty coordination of group efforts. Social loafing is discussed in terms of its experimental generality and theoretical importance. The widesprea…

  • Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy

    Open Access•Stephen G Harkins, Bibb Latane et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1980•Cited by: 7•References: 6

  • Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981•Cited by: 60

  • A Little Acceptance Goes a Long Way: Applying Social Impact Theory to the Rejection–Aggression Link

    Open Access•C Nathan Dewall, J M Twenge et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2010

    Social rejection hurts, causing aggression even against innocent people. How can the sting of social rejection be reduced? Based on social impact theory, the authors predicted that aggression would decrease as a power function of the number of people accepting the participant. In Experiment 1, participants included by 0, 1, 2, or 3 players in an online ball-tossing game could aggress against an innocent stranger by requiring him or her to eat ver…

  • New majorities’ abuse of power: Effects of perceived control and social support

    Open Access•Radmila Prislin, Vanessa Sawicki et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Two studies examined how new majorities (minorities-turned-majorities) abused power by claiming privileges (in-group favoritism) and disparaging new minorities (out-group hostility). Study 1 found that new majorities low in perceived control showed significantly more in-group favoritism than new majorities high in perceived control and stable majorities. The effect of control on new majorities’ in-group favoritism was mediated by certainty about …

  • The impact of fleeting exposure to female exemplars of success in STEM

    Open Access•Megan K Mccarty, Janice R Kelly et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 8

    Two studies tested the impact of subtle cues that associate masculinity with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) success on women’s STEM experiences. Study 1 was a field study conducted in a university campus engineering building where photos of graduating classes were displayed. In Study 2, STEM majors viewed a mock website that depicted either exclusively male or mixed-gender STEM students. Across both studies, women report…

Psychology (6 works) · Social Psychology (6 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 works) · Social loafing (3 works) · Team Dynamics and Performance (3 works) · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 works) · Aggression (1 works) · Applied Psychology (1 works) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae