Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Andrew J Knight

Biographic Data

ID4257225
NAMEAndrew J Knight
GIVEN NAMESAndrew J
FAMILY NAMEKnight
SIGNATUREKNIGHT A J
AFFILIATIONSFood Safety Policy Center, 165 Food Safety & Toxicology Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS16
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2005
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
H-INDEX2
  • Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2009

    Compared to their European counterparts, the American public has been characterized as relatively unknowledgeable and indifferent about genetically modified foods. To evaluate these claims, six focus groups were held in three Arkansas cities to: (1) determine the extent of knowledge the public possesses about genetically modified foods; (2) detail perceived benefits and risks associated with agricultural biotechnology applications; and (3) explor…

  • “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2008

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture, and the Risk Society

    Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    This article evaluates the risk/reflexive society perspective empirically by examining debates surrounding agricultural biotechnologies and the relationships between concepts associated with this perspective and support for agricultural biotechnology applications, using data from a regional U.S. Southwest telephone survey (n = 432). The perspective aided in conceptualizing debates surrounding agricultural biotechnology applications. Proponents of…

  • Determinants of Food Safety Risks

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 45

    This research employs a multi-disciplinary approach by developing a model that draws upon psychometric, cultural, and reflexive modernization perspectives of risk perception. Using data from a 1999 national telephone survey, we tested our model on three food risks— pesticides, Salmonella, and fat. Results showed that perceptions of risks do vary by the nature of the risk investigated. Consistent with the psychometric perspective, the level of kno…

  • Determinants of Food Safety Risks

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 45

    This research employs a multi-disciplinary approach by developing a model that draws upon psychometric, cultural, and reflexive modernization perspectives of risk perception. Using data from a 1999 national telephone survey, we tested our model on three food risks— pesticides, Salmonella, and fat. Results showed that perceptions of risks do vary by the nature of the risk investigated. Consistent with the psychometric perspective, the level of kno…

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture, and the Risk Society

    Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    This article evaluates the risk/reflexive society perspective empirically by examining debates surrounding agricultural biotechnologies and the relationships between concepts associated with this perspective and support for agricultural biotechnology applications, using data from a regional U.S. Southwest telephone survey (n = 432). The perspective aided in conceptualizing debates surrounding agricultural biotechnology applications. Proponents of…

  • Determinants of Food Safety Risks

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Rural Sociology•2005•Cited by: 10•References: 45

    This research employs a multi-disciplinary approach by developing a model that draws upon psychometric, cultural, and reflexive modernization perspectives of risk perception. Using data from a 1999 national telephone survey, we tested our model on three food risks— pesticides, Salmonella, and fat. Results showed that perceptions of risks do vary by the nature of the risk investigated. Consistent with the psychometric perspective, the level of kno…

  • Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture, and the Risk Society

    Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Society & Natural Resources•2006•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    This article evaluates the risk/reflexive society perspective empirically by examining debates surrounding agricultural biotechnologies and the relationships between concepts associated with this perspective and support for agricultural biotechnology applications, using data from a regional U.S. Southwest telephone survey (n = 432). The perspective aided in conceptualizing debates surrounding agricultural biotechnology applications. Proponents of…

  • “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2008

  • Resilience in the US red meat industry

    Open Access•Michelle R Worosz, Andrew Knight et al.•ARTICLE•Agriculture and Human Values•2008•Cited by: 5•References: 9

  • Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process

    Open Access•Andrew Knight, Andrew J Knight•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2009

    Compared to their European counterparts, the American public has been characterized as relatively unknowledgeable and indifferent about genetically modified foods. To evaluate these claims, six focus groups were held in three Arkansas cities to: (1) determine the extent of knowledge the public possesses about genetically modified foods; (2) detail perceived benefits and risks associated with agricultural biotechnology applications; and (3) explor…

Political science (4 works) · Biology (3 works) · Agricultural biotechnology (2 works) · Agriculture (2 works) · Biotechnology (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Food Safety and Hygiene (2 works) · Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 works) · Law (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae