Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Thomas Klausch

Biographic Data

ID4268696
NAMEThomas Klausch
GIVEN NAMESThomas
FAMILY NAMEKlausch
SIGNATUREKLAUSCH T
AFFILIATIONSUtrecht University
ORCID0000-0001-8771-1742
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS27
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
H-INDEX3
  • Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixed-mode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Barry Schouten et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 47

    This study evaluated three types of bias-total, measurement, and selection bias (SB)-in three sequential mixed-mode designs of the Dutch Crime Victimization Survey: telephone, mail, and web, where nonrespondents were followed up face-to-face (F2F). In the absence of true scores, all biases were estimated as mode effects against two different types of benchmarks. In the single-mode benchmark (SMB), effects were evaluated against a F2F reference su…

  • Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Joop J Hox et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2013•Cited by: 11•References: 53

    This study applies ordinal confirmatory factor analysis for multiple groups to assess equivalence of scale, random errors and systematic (nonrandom) errors of attitudinal questions surveyed on rating scales under different survey modes (Face-to-Face [F2F], Telephone, Paper, and Web). Empirical findings from a large-scale experiment are presented. Consistent with theoretical expectations, interviewer- and self-administered surveys measured all ass…

  • Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys

    Barry Schouten, Jan Van Den Brakel et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Joop J Hox et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2013•Cited by: 11•References: 53

    This study applies ordinal confirmatory factor analysis for multiple groups to assess equivalence of scale, random errors and systematic (nonrandom) errors of attitudinal questions surveyed on rating scales under different survey modes (Face-to-Face [F2F], Telephone, Paper, and Web). Empirical findings from a large-scale experiment are presented. Consistent with theoretical expectations, interviewer- and self-administered surveys measured all ass…

  • Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys

    Barry Schouten, Jan Van Den Brakel et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixed-mode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Barry Schouten et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 47

    This study evaluated three types of bias-total, measurement, and selection bias (SB)-in three sequential mixed-mode designs of the Dutch Crime Victimization Survey: telephone, mail, and web, where nonrespondents were followed up face-to-face (F2F). In the absence of true scores, all biases were estimated as mode effects against two different types of benchmarks. In the single-mode benchmark (SMB), effects were evaluated against a F2F reference su…

  • Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Joop J Hox et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2013•Cited by: 11•References: 53

    This study applies ordinal confirmatory factor analysis for multiple groups to assess equivalence of scale, random errors and systematic (nonrandom) errors of attitudinal questions surveyed on rating scales under different survey modes (Face-to-Face [F2F], Telephone, Paper, and Web). Empirical findings from a large-scale experiment are presented. Consistent with theoretical expectations, interviewer- and self-administered surveys measured all ass…

  • Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys

    Barry Schouten, Jan Van Den Brakel et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixed-mode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys

    Open Access•Thomas Klausch, Barry Schouten et al.•ARTICLE•Sociological Methods & Research•2017•Cited by: 7•References: 47

    This study evaluated three types of bias-total, measurement, and selection bias (SB)-in three sequential mixed-mode designs of the Dutch Crime Victimization Survey: telephone, mail, and web, where nonrespondents were followed up face-to-face (F2F). In the absence of true scores, all biases were estimated as mode effects against two different types of benchmarks. In the single-mode benchmark (SMB), effects were evaluated against a F2F reference su…

Econometrics (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Statistics (3 works) · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (3 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Interview (2 works) · Mode (computer interface) (2 works) · Scale (ratio) (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae