Nancy J Manring
Biographic Data
| ID | 4271146 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nancy J Manring |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nancy J |
| FAMILY NAME | Manring |
| SIGNATURE | MANRING N J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ohio University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 27 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
The Politics of Accountability in National Forest Planning
On December 6, 2002, the Forest Service published a proposed planning regulation that provides a framework for community-based collaborative planning for sustainability, alters the spatial and temporal scales of public involvement, and replaces postdecisional appeals of forest plans with a predecisional objection process. This article examines the potential effects of community-based collaborative planning on national environmental stakeholders a…
Locking the Back Door
The Forest Service's new planning regulation “locks the back door.” It replaces post-decisional appeals of forest plans with a “predecisional objection process” within a framework of collaborative planning. This article examines the agency's rationale for eliminating postdecisional appeals of forest plans, and explores the potential implications of this policy initiative. Viewing appeals as a mechanism of democratic accountability, the analysis e…
Alternative dispute resolution and organizational incentives in the U.S. forest service
In 1989, the U.S. Forest Service revised its administrative appeal regulation, placing explicit emphasis on negotiations between Forest Service officers and appellants. This article examines why it would be in the interests of a large federal bureaucracy to formally endorse negotiation, a type of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process, through codified regulation. The article begins to fill a gap in the dispute resolution literature by anal…
Collaborative Resource Management
This article examines some of the key barriers to collaborative resource management: the differential costs and benefits of these approaches for organizations and individuals. Drawing on the U.S. Forest Service’s use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve forest plan appeals in the late 1980s, the analysis shows that although ADR can benefit the larger organization, the individuals who actually participate in ADR incur perso…
Teetering at the Top of the Ladder
Citizen groups that participate in alternative dispute resolution processes have overcome many of the barriers described in Sherry Arnstein's classic article, 'A Ladder of Citizen Participation.' A well-structured collaborative process can remedy some of the imbalances and other stumbling blocks inherent in traditional forums, broadening the issues considered as well as the potential solutions. At the top of the ladder, there exists a three-runge…
ADR and Administrative Responsiveness
In recent years, alternative dispute resolution (ADR)(1) has received a great deal of attention at the federal level. The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), whose mission is to promote improvements in the efficiency, fairness, and adequacy of federal agency operating procedures, held conferences, conducted research, and published recommendations promoting the use of ADR by federal agencies throughout the 1980s. This interest i…
Reconciling Science and Politics in Forest Service Decision Making
In recent years, a wide variety of federal agencies have utilized alternative dispute resolution (ADR) approaches to resolve controversial issues. Although public officials represent central actors in most ADRs, there has been little systematic examination of their experiences and perceptions of ADR. This work begins to fill this gap by examining a key issue of concern for public officials: the impact of negotiations on professionally based decis…
Social impact assessment and environmental conflict management
Teetering at the Top of the Ladder
Citizen groups that participate in alternative dispute resolution processes have overcome many of the barriers described in Sherry Arnstein's classic article, 'A Ladder of Citizen Participation.' A well-structured collaborative process can remedy some of the imbalances and other stumbling blocks inherent in traditional forums, broadening the issues considered as well as the potential solutions. At the top of the ladder, there exists a three-runge…
Social impact assessment and environmental conflict management
Reconciling Science and Politics in Forest Service Decision Making
In recent years, a wide variety of federal agencies have utilized alternative dispute resolution (ADR) approaches to resolve controversial issues. Although public officials represent central actors in most ADRs, there has been little systematic examination of their experiences and perceptions of ADR. This work begins to fill this gap by examining a key issue of concern for public officials: the impact of negotiations on professionally based decis…
The Politics of Accountability in National Forest Planning
On December 6, 2002, the Forest Service published a proposed planning regulation that provides a framework for community-based collaborative planning for sustainability, alters the spatial and temporal scales of public involvement, and replaces postdecisional appeals of forest plans with a predecisional objection process. This article examines the potential effects of community-based collaborative planning on national environmental stakeholders a…
Locking the Back Door
The Forest Service's new planning regulation “locks the back door.” It replaces post-decisional appeals of forest plans with a “predecisional objection process” within a framework of collaborative planning. This article examines the agency's rationale for eliminating postdecisional appeals of forest plans, and explores the potential implications of this policy initiative. Viewing appeals as a mechanism of democratic accountability, the analysis e…
Alternative dispute resolution and organizational incentives in the U.S. forest service
In 1989, the U.S. Forest Service revised its administrative appeal regulation, placing explicit emphasis on negotiations between Forest Service officers and appellants. This article examines why it would be in the interests of a large federal bureaucracy to formally endorse negotiation, a type of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process, through codified regulation. The article begins to fill a gap in the dispute resolution literature by anal…
Collaborative Resource Management
This article examines some of the key barriers to collaborative resource management: the differential costs and benefits of these approaches for organizations and individuals. Drawing on the U.S. Forest Service’s use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve forest plan appeals in the late 1980s, the analysis shows that although ADR can benefit the larger organization, the individuals who actually participate in ADR incur perso…
Social impact assessment and environmental conflict management
Reconciling Science and Politics in Forest Service Decision Making
In recent years, a wide variety of federal agencies have utilized alternative dispute resolution (ADR) approaches to resolve controversial issues. Although public officials represent central actors in most ADRs, there has been little systematic examination of their experiences and perceptions of ADR. This work begins to fill this gap by examining a key issue of concern for public officials: the impact of negotiations on professionally based decis…
ADR and Administrative Responsiveness
In recent years, alternative dispute resolution (ADR)(1) has received a great deal of attention at the federal level. The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), whose mission is to promote improvements in the efficiency, fairness, and adequacy of federal agency operating procedures, held conferences, conducted research, and published recommendations promoting the use of ADR by federal agencies throughout the 1980s. This interest i…
Teetering at the Top of the Ladder
Citizen groups that participate in alternative dispute resolution processes have overcome many of the barriers described in Sherry Arnstein's classic article, 'A Ladder of Citizen Participation.' A well-structured collaborative process can remedy some of the imbalances and other stumbling blocks inherent in traditional forums, broadening the issues considered as well as the potential solutions. At the top of the ladder, there exists a three-runge…
Alternative dispute resolution and organizational incentives in the U.S. forest service
In 1989, the U.S. Forest Service revised its administrative appeal regulation, placing explicit emphasis on negotiations between Forest Service officers and appellants. This article examines why it would be in the interests of a large federal bureaucracy to formally endorse negotiation, a type of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process, through codified regulation. The article begins to fill a gap in the dispute resolution literature by anal…
Collaborative Resource Management
This article examines some of the key barriers to collaborative resource management: the differential costs and benefits of these approaches for organizations and individuals. Drawing on the U.S. Forest Service’s use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes to resolve forest plan appeals in the late 1980s, the analysis shows that although ADR can benefit the larger organization, the individuals who actually participate in ADR incur perso…
Locking the Back Door
The Forest Service's new planning regulation “locks the back door.” It replaces post-decisional appeals of forest plans with a “predecisional objection process” within a framework of collaborative planning. This article examines the agency's rationale for eliminating postdecisional appeals of forest plans, and explores the potential implications of this policy initiative. Viewing appeals as a mechanism of democratic accountability, the analysis e…
The Politics of Accountability in National Forest Planning
On December 6, 2002, the Forest Service published a proposed planning regulation that provides a framework for community-based collaborative planning for sustainability, alters the spatial and temporal scales of public involvement, and replaces postdecisional appeals of forest plans with a predecisional objection process. This article examines the potential effects of community-based collaborative planning on national environmental stakeholders a…
Political science (8 works) · Public relations (8 works) · Business (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Public Administration (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Forest Management and Policy (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Public Administration (5 works) · Economics (4 works)