Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Baltimore

Biographic Data

ID4347211
NAMEDavid Baltimore
GIVEN NAMESDavid
FAMILY NAMEBaltimore
SIGNATUREBALTIMORE D
AFFILIATIONSAmerican Cancer Society
ORCID0000-0001-8723-8190
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Preface

    Open Access•David Baltimore, David S Tatel et al.•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2024

    Several years ago, in the Fall 2018 volume of Dædalus, we wrote “Bridging the Science-Law Divide,” an essay about the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Committee on Science, Technology, and Law.1 In that essay, we discussed the importance of having the legal and scientific communities engage with each other on a host of issues, and highlighted work that the committee conducted on the courts' handling of scien…

  • Bridging the Science-Law Divide

    Open Access•David Baltimore, David S Tatel et al.•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2018

    Formal opportunities for members of the scientific and legal communities to engage in ongoing collegial consideration of issues at the interface of science and law are limited. In the late 1990s, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine established the Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)-composed of equal numbers of members from science, engineering, and law-to provide an ongoing forum that would build permanent …

  • A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification

    Open Access•David Baltimore, Paul Berg et al.•ARTICLE•Science•2015

    A framework for open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome is urgently needed

  • The Network Collective

    Open Access•Klaus Eichmann, Oswald T Avery et al.•BOOK•The network collective•2008

    First-hand account of the rise and fall of a scientific paradigm Shows how scientific fiction turns to fact Highlights the origin of scientific hype Includes interviews with prominent scientists The network paradigm dominated immunological research from the early 1970s to the late 1980s. The originator, Niels Jerne, hypothesized that the vast diversity of antibodies in each individual forms a network of mutual "idiotypic" recognition, thus regula…

  • Limiting science

    Open Access•David Baltimore•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446

  • A Capital Campaign

    Open Access•Derek Bok, George F Will et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1984

  • The Berg Letter

    David Baltimore•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1980

  • Can Some Knowledge Simply Cost Too Much

    Graham Shedd, Fred Wiseman et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1975

  • Limiting science

    Open Access•David Baltimore•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446

  • Can Some Knowledge Simply Cost Too Much

    Graham Shedd, Fred Wiseman et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1975

  • The Berg Letter

    David Baltimore•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1980

  • A Capital Campaign

    Open Access•Derek Bok, George F Will et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1984

  • Limiting science

    Open Access•David Baltimore•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2005•Cited by: 1•References: 2

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446

  • The Network Collective

    Open Access•Klaus Eichmann, Oswald T Avery et al.•BOOK•The network collective•2008

    First-hand account of the rise and fall of a scientific paradigm Shows how scientific fiction turns to fact Highlights the origin of scientific hype Includes interviews with prominent scientists The network paradigm dominated immunological research from the early 1970s to the late 1980s. The originator, Niels Jerne, hypothesized that the vast diversity of antibodies in each individual forms a network of mutual "idiotypic" recognition, thus regula…

  • A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification

    Open Access•David Baltimore, Paul Berg et al.•ARTICLE•Science•2015

    A framework for open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome is urgently needed

  • Bridging the Science-Law Divide

    Open Access•David Baltimore, David S Tatel et al.•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2018

    Formal opportunities for members of the scientific and legal communities to engage in ongoing collegial consideration of issues at the interface of science and law are limited. In the late 1990s, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine established the Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)-composed of equal numbers of members from science, engineering, and law-to provide an ongoing forum that would build permanent …

  • Preface

    Open Access•David Baltimore, David S Tatel et al.•ARTICLE•Daedalus•2024

    Several years ago, in the Fall 2018 volume of Dædalus, we wrote “Bridging the Science-Law Divide,” an essay about the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Committee on Science, Technology, and Law.1 In that essay, we discussed the importance of having the legal and scientific communities engage with each other on a host of issues, and highlighted work that the committee conducted on the courts' handling of scien…

Political science (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Engineering ethics (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Biology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae