David Baltimore
Biographic Data
| ID | 4347211 |
|---|---|
| NAME | David Baltimore |
| GIVEN NAMES | David |
| FAMILY NAME | Baltimore |
| SIGNATURE | BALTIMORE D |
| AFFILIATIONS | American Cancer Society |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8723-8190 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1975 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Preface
Several years ago, in the Fall 2018 volume of Dædalus, we wrote “Bridging the Science-Law Divide,” an essay about the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Committee on Science, Technology, and Law.1 In that essay, we discussed the importance of having the legal and scientific communities engage with each other on a host of issues, and highlighted work that the committee conducted on the courts' handling of scien…
Bridging the Science-Law Divide
Formal opportunities for members of the scientific and legal communities to engage in ongoing collegial consideration of issues at the interface of science and law are limited. In the late 1990s, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine established the Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)-composed of equal numbers of members from science, engineering, and law-to provide an ongoing forum that would build permanent …
A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification
A framework for open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome is urgently needed
The Network Collective
First-hand account of the rise and fall of a scientific paradigm Shows how scientific fiction turns to fact Highlights the origin of scientific hype Includes interviews with prominent scientists The network paradigm dominated immunological research from the early 1970s to the late 1980s. The originator, Niels Jerne, hypothesized that the vast diversity of antibodies in each individual forms a network of mutual "idiotypic" recognition, thus regula…
Limiting science
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446
A Capital Campaign
The Berg Letter
Can Some Knowledge Simply Cost Too Much
Limiting science
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446
Can Some Knowledge Simply Cost Too Much
The Berg Letter
A Capital Campaign
Limiting science
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/001152605774431446
The Network Collective
First-hand account of the rise and fall of a scientific paradigm Shows how scientific fiction turns to fact Highlights the origin of scientific hype Includes interviews with prominent scientists The network paradigm dominated immunological research from the early 1970s to the late 1980s. The originator, Niels Jerne, hypothesized that the vast diversity of antibodies in each individual forms a network of mutual "idiotypic" recognition, thus regula…
A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification
A framework for open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome is urgently needed
Bridging the Science-Law Divide
Formal opportunities for members of the scientific and legal communities to engage in ongoing collegial consideration of issues at the interface of science and law are limited. In the late 1990s, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine established the Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)-composed of equal numbers of members from science, engineering, and law-to provide an ongoing forum that would build permanent …
Preface
Several years ago, in the Fall 2018 volume of Dædalus, we wrote “Bridging the Science-Law Divide,” an essay about the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Committee on Science, Technology, and Law.1 In that essay, we discussed the importance of having the legal and scientific communities engage with each other on a host of issues, and highlighted work that the committee conducted on the courts' handling of scien…
Political science (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Engineering ethics (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Biology (2 works)