Bridging the Science-Law Divide
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9684801 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Baltimore (0000-0001-8723-8190, National Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), David S Tatel (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit), Anne-Marie Mazza (University of the Sciences) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 147 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 181-194 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Daedalus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-5266 • E-ISSN: 1548-6192 |
| Publisher | MIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1162/daed_a_00528 |
| OpenAlex | W2894280330 |
| Language | EN |
Formal opportunities for members of the scientific and legal communities to engage in ongoing collegial consideration of issues at the interface of science and law are limited. In the late 1990s, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine established the Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)-composed of equal numbers of members from science, engineering, and law-to provide an ongoing forum that would build permanent links between these communities. The range of issues investigated by the CSTL and the influence of these explorations are discussed in this essay
Bridging (networking · Engineering ethics · Political science · Science and engineering · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|