Umut Yüksel
Biographic Data
| ID | 4382533 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Umut Yüksel |
| GIVEN NAMES | Umut |
| FAMILY NAME | Yüksel |
| SIGNATURE | YUKSEL U |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8561-3559 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Law Behind Dispute Onset: How Legal Uncertainty Drives Maritime Boundary Disputes
The making of international law through multilateral conventions and adjudication often leads to periods of legal uncertainty, times in which there are alternative rules and divergent views on how they ought to be applied to particular cases. I argue that legal uncertainty gives states opportunities and incentives to formulate excessive unilateral claims, thus making disputes more likely to arise. I illustrate my argument with a comprehensive ana…
Understanding the Limitations of Behavioralism: Lessons from the Field of Maritime Delimitation
Do states take court decisions into account when formulating policies? If so, how do they process new judicial input and make policies in response to them? While self-interest and incentives are the usual elements involved in a rational choice explanation of policymaking, behavioralist scholarship casts doubt on whether decisionmakers are able to identify and pursue their interests in a rational manner. We draw on rational and behavioral approach…
The Law Behind Dispute Onset: How Legal Uncertainty Drives Maritime Boundary Disputes
The making of international law through multilateral conventions and adjudication often leads to periods of legal uncertainty, times in which there are alternative rules and divergent views on how they ought to be applied to particular cases. I argue that legal uncertainty gives states opportunities and incentives to formulate excessive unilateral claims, thus making disputes more likely to arise. I illustrate my argument with a comprehensive ana…
Understanding the Limitations of Behavioralism: Lessons from the Field of Maritime Delimitation
Do states take court decisions into account when formulating policies? If so, how do they process new judicial input and make policies in response to them? While self-interest and incentives are the usual elements involved in a rational choice explanation of policymaking, behavioralist scholarship casts doubt on whether decisionmakers are able to identify and pursue their interests in a rational manner. We draw on rational and behavioral approach…
The Law Behind Dispute Onset: How Legal Uncertainty Drives Maritime Boundary Disputes
The making of international law through multilateral conventions and adjudication often leads to periods of legal uncertainty, times in which there are alternative rules and divergent views on how they ought to be applied to particular cases. I argue that legal uncertainty gives states opportunities and incentives to formulate excessive unilateral claims, thus making disputes more likely to arise. I illustrate my argument with a comprehensive ana…
Economics (2 works) · International Maritime Law Issues (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Adjudication (1 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 works) · Boundary (topology (1 works) · Coastal and Marine Management (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works)