Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James B Lemert

Biographic Data

ID4402714
NAMEJames B Lemert
GIVEN NAMESJames B
FAMILY NAMELemert
SIGNATURELEMERT J B
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Oregon
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS184
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1969
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
H-INDEX5
  • Public Journalism and Changes in Content of the Seattle Times

    Open Access•Thomas F Blazier, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Newspaper Research Journal•2000•Cited by: 9

    Few identifiable changes in content occurred when the Seattle Times adopted its “Front Porch Forum” public journalism approach. Most of the changes occurred in conjunction with the FPF logo, not anywhere else in the paper

  • Party Identification and Negative Advertising in a U.S. Senate Election

    Open Access•James B Lemert, Wayne Wanta et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1999

    The authors sampled registered voters who had, and had not, voted in a vote-by-mail special election. They tested Ansolabehere and Iyengar's (1995) conclusion that attack ads mostly discourage independents from voting and reinforce the loyalties of Republicans and Democrats. Democrat Ron Wyden, the narrow winner of the election, pledged late in the campaign that he would no longer “go negative.” Republican Gordon Smith did not follow suit. Only R…

  • Alternative Newspapers and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•Douglas W Stanfield, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 2

  • Picking the Winners

    James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986•Cited by: 14•References: 6

    Both politicians and voters were asked to predict outcomes of two Oregon ballot measures in 1982. As expected, politicians' predictions always were closer to the mark than voters' were. Further, voters showed stronger signs of wishful thinking (the “Looking-Glass effect”) in their predictions than did politicians. Using published preelection polls apparently improved politicians' accuracy in 1982, as well as voters' accuracy in a separate 1984 su…

  • Effects of Viewing a Presidential Primary Debate

    Open Access•James B Lemert, William R Elliott et al.•ARTICLE•Communication Research•1983•Cited by: 6

    Do televised debates between presidential candidates stimulate campaign interest and learning? This question can best be answered by controlling the problem of self-selection: The people who normally watch may already be interested in the presidential campaign. Since the self-selection problem may be most acute during the fall campaign, we chose to study the effects of the February 20, 1980, debate involving seven Republican candidates. Experimen…

  • Journalists and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•James B Lemert, Barry N Mitzman et al.•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1977•Cited by: 27

  • Status Conferral and Topic Scope

    Open Access•James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1969

    Journal Article Status Conferral and Topic Scope Get access James B. Lemert James B. Lemert 1James B. Lemert is Director of the Division of Communication Research at the University of Oregon. Prior to receiving his Ph.D. in communication from Michigan State University, he worked as a newspaper reporter in California. Lemert reports that his interest in status conferral stems in part from his reactions to press coverage of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, an…

  • Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources

    David K Berlo, James B Lemert et al.•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1969•Cited by: 126

    The research reported here extends the work of Hovland and his colleagues on source credibility by investigating the criteria actually used by receivers in evaluating message sources. Three dimensions are isolated: Safety, Qualification, and Dynamism. The authors argue that source "image" should be defined in terms of the perceptions of the receiver, not in terms of objective characteristics of the source

  • Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources

    David K Berlo, James B Lemert et al.•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1969•Cited by: 126

    The research reported here extends the work of Hovland and his colleagues on source credibility by investigating the criteria actually used by receivers in evaluating message sources. Three dimensions are isolated: Safety, Qualification, and Dynamism. The authors argue that source "image" should be defined in terms of the perceptions of the receiver, not in terms of objective characteristics of the source

  • Journalists and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•James B Lemert, Barry N Mitzman et al.•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1977•Cited by: 27

  • Picking the Winners

    James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986•Cited by: 14•References: 6

    Both politicians and voters were asked to predict outcomes of two Oregon ballot measures in 1982. As expected, politicians' predictions always were closer to the mark than voters' were. Further, voters showed stronger signs of wishful thinking (the “Looking-Glass effect”) in their predictions than did politicians. Using published preelection polls apparently improved politicians' accuracy in 1982, as well as voters' accuracy in a separate 1984 su…

  • Public Journalism and Changes in Content of the Seattle Times

    Open Access•Thomas F Blazier, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Newspaper Research Journal•2000•Cited by: 9

    Few identifiable changes in content occurred when the Seattle Times adopted its “Front Porch Forum” public journalism approach. Most of the changes occurred in conjunction with the FPF logo, not anywhere else in the paper

  • Effects of Viewing a Presidential Primary Debate

    Open Access•James B Lemert, William R Elliott et al.•ARTICLE•Communication Research•1983•Cited by: 6

    Do televised debates between presidential candidates stimulate campaign interest and learning? This question can best be answered by controlling the problem of self-selection: The people who normally watch may already be interested in the presidential campaign. Since the self-selection problem may be most acute during the fall campaign, we chose to study the effects of the February 20, 1980, debate involving seven Republican candidates. Experimen…

  • Alternative Newspapers and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•Douglas W Stanfield, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 2

  • Status Conferral and Topic Scope

    Open Access•James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1969

    Journal Article Status Conferral and Topic Scope Get access James B. Lemert James B. Lemert 1James B. Lemert is Director of the Division of Communication Research at the University of Oregon. Prior to receiving his Ph.D. in communication from Michigan State University, he worked as a newspaper reporter in California. Lemert reports that his interest in status conferral stems in part from his reactions to press coverage of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, an…

  • Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources

    David K Berlo, James B Lemert et al.•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1969•Cited by: 126

    The research reported here extends the work of Hovland and his colleagues on source credibility by investigating the criteria actually used by receivers in evaluating message sources. Three dimensions are isolated: Safety, Qualification, and Dynamism. The authors argue that source "image" should be defined in terms of the perceptions of the receiver, not in terms of objective characteristics of the source

  • Journalists and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•James B Lemert, Barry N Mitzman et al.•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1977•Cited by: 27

  • Effects of Viewing a Presidential Primary Debate

    Open Access•James B Lemert, William R Elliott et al.•ARTICLE•Communication Research•1983•Cited by: 6

    Do televised debates between presidential candidates stimulate campaign interest and learning? This question can best be answered by controlling the problem of self-selection: The people who normally watch may already be interested in the presidential campaign. Since the self-selection problem may be most acute during the fall campaign, we chose to study the effects of the February 20, 1980, debate involving seven Republican candidates. Experimen…

  • Picking the Winners

    James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986•Cited by: 14•References: 6

    Both politicians and voters were asked to predict outcomes of two Oregon ballot measures in 1982. As expected, politicians' predictions always were closer to the mark than voters' were. Further, voters showed stronger signs of wishful thinking (the “Looking-Glass effect”) in their predictions than did politicians. Using published preelection polls apparently improved politicians' accuracy in 1982, as well as voters' accuracy in a separate 1984 su…

  • Alternative Newspapers and Mobilizing Information

    Open Access•Douglas W Stanfield, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Journalism Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 2

  • Party Identification and Negative Advertising in a U.S. Senate Election

    Open Access•James B Lemert, Wayne Wanta et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1999

    The authors sampled registered voters who had, and had not, voted in a vote-by-mail special election. They tested Ansolabehere and Iyengar's (1995) conclusion that attack ads mostly discourage independents from voting and reinforce the loyalties of Republicans and Democrats. Democrat Ron Wyden, the narrow winner of the election, pledged late in the campaign that he would no longer “go negative.” Republican Gordon Smith did not follow suit. Only R…

  • Public Journalism and Changes in Content of the Seattle Times

    Open Access•Thomas F Blazier, James B Lemert•ARTICLE•Newspaper Research Journal•2000•Cited by: 9

    Few identifiable changes in content occurred when the Seattle Times adopted its “Front Porch Forum” public journalism approach. Most of the changes occurred in conjunction with the FPF logo, not anywhere else in the paper

Political science (8 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Social Media and Politics (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Media studies (3 works) · Media Studies and Communication (3 works) · Newspaper (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae