Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Picking the Winners

Politician vs. Voter Predictions of Two Controversial Ballot Measures

Bibliographic Data

ID6368563
AuthorsJames B Lemert
Year1986
Volume50
Issue2
Pages208
Publication date1986-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/268975
OpenAlexW2124157877
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited7

Both politicians and voters were asked to predict outcomes of two Oregon ballot measures in 1982. As expected, politicians' predictions always were closer to the mark than voters' were. Further, voters showed stronger signs of wishful thinking (the “Looking-Glass effect”) in their predictions than did politicians. Using published preelection polls apparently improved politicians' accuracy in 1982, as well as voters' accuracy in a separate 1984 survey. No other sources of data improved predictive accuracy. Findings have implications for theories of representative government and are consistent with a new theory of public opinion

Ballot · Econometrics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Opinion poll · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public opinion · Voting · Wishful thinking · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Principles of Forecasting

    J Scott Armstrong•Principles of Forecasting•2001

  • Voters’ wishful thinking in an unprecedented event of three national elections repeated within one year

    Refael Tikochinski, Elisha Babad•Thinking & Reasoning•2023

  • Citizen Forecasts of the 2008 U . S . Presidential Election

    Open Access•Michael K Miller, Guanchun Wang et al.•Politics & Policy•2012

  • To hope was to expect”

    Open Access•Jason P Rose, Olivia Aspiras•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2020

  • Predicting a win by a small margin

    Open Access•Edith Shalev, Eyal Peer•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2023

  • Wishful thinking in mass–elite electoral expectations

    Open Access•Philippe Mongrain, Anam Kuraishi et al.•Electoral Studies•2026

  • Social information and bandwagon behavior in voting

    Open Access•Ivo Bischoff, Henrik Egbert•Journal of Economic Psychology•2013

  • Inclusive and exclusive modes of thinking

    Open Access•Ilan Yaniv, Yaacov Schul et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002

  • Wish and Reality in Voters' Predictions of Election Outcomes

    Elisha Babad, Eitan Yacobos•Political Psychology•1993

  • Accuracy of Vote Expectation Surveys in Forecasting Elections

    Andreas Graefe•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Projection in Politicians' Perceptions of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Julie Sevenans, Stefaan Walgrave et al.•Political Psychology•2023

  • Testing Our Quasi‐Statistical Sense

    Open Access•Shira Dvir Gvirsman, Shira Dvir-Gvirsman•Political Psychology•2015

  • United in misperception? How politicians and party electorates assess each other’s policy preferences

    Open Access•Marie Kübler•Party Politics•2025

  • Partisan Preferences, Electoral Prospects, and Economic Expectations

    Open Access•Matthew Ladner, Christopher Wlezien•Comparative Political Studies•2007

  • Vote expectations at the next level. Trying to predict vote shares in the 2013 German federal election by polling expectations

    Open Access•Christian Ganser, Patrick Riordan•Electoral Studies•2015

  • More than wishful thinking

    Open Access•Michael F Meffert, Sascha Huber et al.•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Representatives' Perceptions of Constituency Opinion

    Ronald D Hedlund, H Paul Friesema•The Journal of Politics•1972

  • Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public

    James M Fields, Howard Schuman•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • Pluralistic Ignorance-A Replication and Extension

    Hubert J O''Gorman, Hubert J O'Gorman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • Measuring Representation

    Christopher H Achen•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Electoral Myth and Reality

    Open Access•Philip E Converse, Aage R Clausen et al.•American Political Science Review•1965

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,48
Citation span1993 - 2026 (34)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae