Sarah J Wallace
Biographic Data
| ID | 4594752 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sarah J Wallace |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sarah J |
| FAMILY NAME | Wallace |
| SIGNATURE | WALLACE S J |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Queensland |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0600-9343 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Evaluating the Co‐Design and Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication in Aged Care
Co‐Design of a Unified, International Aphasia Awareness Campaign
Introduction Poor aphasia awareness is an international problem. Previous aphasia awareness campaigns have lacked coordination across countries and have not routinely involved people with the diversity of skills needed to design a campaign. We aimed to co‐design a unified, international aphasia awareness campaign. Methods An international, multi‐stakeholder co‐design project was conducted, using online iterative workshops. People with lived exper…
Co‐Designing Aphasia Services
BACKGROUND: People with aphasia (PWA, impaired language/communication) are often excluded from research that concerns them due to a lack of methodological adaptations to support communication. This paper describes adaptations to support their involvement in experience-based codesign (EBCD). AIMS: To describe the involvement of PWA in EBCD and critically evaluate adaptations required to support involvement. METHODS: Mixed methods process evaluatio…
Aphasia-specific or generic outcomes? a comparison of two health-related quality of life instruments for economic evaluations of aphasia treatments
Our findings suggest that EQ-5D-3L use in economic evaluations including people with aphasia requires caution. Alternative HRQOL instruments require evaluation to ensure fair prioritisation of aphasia treatments
Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post‐Stroke Aphasia Services Through End‐User Involvement
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no agreed quality standards for post-stroke aphasia services. Therefore, it is unknown if care reflects best practices or meets the expectations of people living with aphasia. We aimed to (1) shortlist, (2) operationalise and (3) prioritise best practice recommendations for post-stroke aphasia care. METHODS: Three phases of research were conducted. In Phase 1, recommendations with strong evidence and/or known to b…
Qualitative Exploration of Speech Pathologists' Experiences and Priorities for Aphasia Service Design
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Stroke survivors with aphasia (impaired language/communication) have poor outcomes and gaps in the clinical implementation of best practice contribute to this. Little is known, however, about speech pathologist perspectives on the touchpoints (key moments shaping experiences) in the clinical care pathway that have the greatest impact on service delivery nor how this varies by geographical location. We explored the experienc…
‘A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want’
INTRODUCTION: Outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are used to gauge the effects of treatment. In post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation, benchmarks for meaningful change are needed to support the interpretation of patient outcomes. This study is part of a research programme to establish minimal important change (MIC) values (the smallest change above which patients perceive themselves as importantly changed) for core OMIs. As a first step in this …
No prominent works on this page.
Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post‐Stroke Aphasia Services Through End‐User Involvement
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no agreed quality standards for post-stroke aphasia services. Therefore, it is unknown if care reflects best practices or meets the expectations of people living with aphasia. We aimed to (1) shortlist, (2) operationalise and (3) prioritise best practice recommendations for post-stroke aphasia care. METHODS: Three phases of research were conducted. In Phase 1, recommendations with strong evidence and/or known to b…
Qualitative Exploration of Speech Pathologists' Experiences and Priorities for Aphasia Service Design
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Stroke survivors with aphasia (impaired language/communication) have poor outcomes and gaps in the clinical implementation of best practice contribute to this. Little is known, however, about speech pathologist perspectives on the touchpoints (key moments shaping experiences) in the clinical care pathway that have the greatest impact on service delivery nor how this varies by geographical location. We explored the experienc…
‘A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want’
INTRODUCTION: Outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are used to gauge the effects of treatment. In post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation, benchmarks for meaningful change are needed to support the interpretation of patient outcomes. This study is part of a research programme to establish minimal important change (MIC) values (the smallest change above which patients perceive themselves as importantly changed) for core OMIs. As a first step in this …
Co‐Designing Aphasia Services
BACKGROUND: People with aphasia (PWA, impaired language/communication) are often excluded from research that concerns them due to a lack of methodological adaptations to support communication. This paper describes adaptations to support their involvement in experience-based codesign (EBCD). AIMS: To describe the involvement of PWA in EBCD and critically evaluate adaptations required to support involvement. METHODS: Mixed methods process evaluatio…
Aphasia-specific or generic outcomes? a comparison of two health-related quality of life instruments for economic evaluations of aphasia treatments
Our findings suggest that EQ-5D-3L use in economic evaluations including people with aphasia requires caution. Alternative HRQOL instruments require evaluation to ensure fair prioritisation of aphasia treatments
Evaluating the Co‐Design and Implementation of a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication in Aged Care
Co‐Design of a Unified, International Aphasia Awareness Campaign
Introduction Poor aphasia awareness is an international problem. Previous aphasia awareness campaigns have lacked coordination across countries and have not routinely involved people with the diversity of skills needed to design a campaign. We aimed to co‐design a unified, international aphasia awareness campaign. Methods An international, multi‐stakeholder co‐design project was conducted, using online iterative workshops. People with lived exper…
Aphasia (6 works) · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Focus group (4 works) · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Health care (3 works) · Medical education (3 works)