Tareeq Jalloh
Biographic Data
| ID | 4623103 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tareeq Jalloh |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tareeq |
| FAMILY NAME | Jalloh |
| SIGNATURE | JALLOH T |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Oxford Oxford UK |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1373-8533 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Prospects for a Progressive Critique of Self-Sexualizing Rap Music
Self-sexualizing Black women rappers have been criticized as being agents in their own oppression. However, criticism of self-sexualizing rap is just one evaluative response to it. Another response lauds self-sexualizing rap for its empowering effects. In this article, I introduce a framework for understanding these competing evaluative responses to self-sexualizing rap by using Sukaina Hirji’s analysis of oppressive double binds. I argue that se…
Does Drill Rap Cause Violence, and, Even if it Does, Should it Be Censored
The critique that rap causes violence (causal claim) goes back as far as the 1980s, but today drill rappers are having their freedoms restricted based on instances of a causal claim. Police in the UK regularly remove drill videos from social media and streaming platforms, and drillers are being restricted from making music and associating with people via criminal behavior orders based on the claim that drill music causes serious violence. If this…
Speech Acts and Unspeakable Raps
Police censor drill rap music based on the claim that drill artists incite violence. In this article, I provide a framework for evaluating whether an instance of drill constitutes a speech act of incitement. I also introduce an alternative speech act that drillers may also be performing, drawn from sociological work on drill artists. I show that those who claim drill incites violence (such as the Metropolitan Police) must meet the explanatory and…
Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice
In this paper, I look to draw novel connections between critiques of drill and epistemic injustice by addressing the question of whether the critical scrutiny of drill constitutes an epistemic injustice. I argue that these critiques constitute two types of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and contributory injustice. We see testimonial injustice in how courts and police do not give credibility to drill artists' testimonies about the stor…
Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice
In this paper, I look to draw novel connections between critiques of drill and epistemic injustice by addressing the question of whether the critical scrutiny of drill constitutes an epistemic injustice. I argue that these critiques constitute two types of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and contributory injustice. We see testimonial injustice in how courts and police do not give credibility to drill artists' testimonies about the stor…
Speech Acts and Unspeakable Raps
Police censor drill rap music based on the claim that drill artists incite violence. In this article, I provide a framework for evaluating whether an instance of drill constitutes a speech act of incitement. I also introduce an alternative speech act that drillers may also be performing, drawn from sociological work on drill artists. I show that those who claim drill incites violence (such as the Metropolitan Police) must meet the explanatory and…
Does the Critical Scrutiny of Drill Constitute an Epistemic Injustice
In this paper, I look to draw novel connections between critiques of drill and epistemic injustice by addressing the question of whether the critical scrutiny of drill constitutes an epistemic injustice. I argue that these critiques constitute two types of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and contributory injustice. We see testimonial injustice in how courts and police do not give credibility to drill artists' testimonies about the stor…
Speech Acts and Unspeakable Raps
Police censor drill rap music based on the claim that drill artists incite violence. In this article, I provide a framework for evaluating whether an instance of drill constitutes a speech act of incitement. I also introduce an alternative speech act that drillers may also be performing, drawn from sociological work on drill artists. I show that those who claim drill incites violence (such as the Metropolitan Police) must meet the explanatory and…
Prospects for a Progressive Critique of Self-Sexualizing Rap Music
Self-sexualizing Black women rappers have been criticized as being agents in their own oppression. However, criticism of self-sexualizing rap is just one evaluative response to it. Another response lauds self-sexualizing rap for its empowering effects. In this article, I introduce a framework for understanding these competing evaluative responses to self-sexualizing rap by using Sukaina Hirji’s analysis of oppressive double binds. I argue that se…
Does Drill Rap Cause Violence, and, Even if it Does, Should it Be Censored
The critique that rap causes violence (causal claim) goes back as far as the 1980s, but today drill rappers are having their freedoms restricted based on instances of a causal claim. Police in the UK regularly remove drill videos from social media and streaming platforms, and drillers are being restricted from making music and associating with people via criminal behavior orders based on the claim that drill music causes serious violence. If this…
Law in Society and Culture (3 works) · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 works) · Music History and Culture (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 work) · Autonomy (1 work) · Causal analysis (1 work) · Communication (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)