Aleksandra Zielińska
Biographic Data
| ID | 4640715 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Aleksandra Zielińska |
| GIVEN NAMES | Aleksandra |
| FAMILY NAME | Zielińska |
| SIGNATURE | ZIELIŃSKA A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Wrocław |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1476-9828 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 13 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 13 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The links between creativity and cognitive and affective empathy in a large sample of 8- and 9-year-old children
How cognition and metacognition interact in explaining creative confidence
Mapping creativity in the Pisa 2022 student and context questionnaires
Automated assessment of creativity in multilingual narratives
Researchers and educators interested in creative writing need a reliable and efficient tool to score the creativity of narratives, such as short stories. Typically, human raters manually assess narrative creativity, but such subjective scoring is limited by labor costs and rater disagreement. Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success on creativity tasks, yet they have not been applied to scoring narratives, including multilingual…
How do examples impact divergent thinking? The interplay between associative and executive processes
Self-regulation for creative activity
Condensing the Muses
Creative self-perceptions reflect a unique blend of motivational, metacognitive, and personal characteristics, both shaping and being shaped by people’s creative experiences. The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) is a domain-specific measure that captures people’s self-oriented views across five creativity domains: Everyday, Scholarly, Performance, Scientific, and Artistic. The scale’s complex, multidimensional structure comes with con…
Self‐Regulation Prompts Improve Creative Performance
While people approach creative actions in diverse ways, navigating them effectively requires self‐regulatory effort. In this preregistered experiment, we examined whether simple self‐regulation prompts, provided across the stages of the creative process, make the outcomes more creative. Participants ( N = 332) engaged in one of three creativity tasks—designing a logo, writing a short story, or preparing a greeting card—and documented their ongoin…
Who” Is the Best Creative Thinking Partner? An Experimental Investigation of Human–Human, Human–Internet, and Human– AI Co‐Creation
Recent research suggests that working with generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, can produce more creative outcomes than humans alone. However, does AI retain its creative edge when humans have access to alternative information sources, such as another human or the internet. We explored this question in a between‐group experiment with 202 German participants across four conditions (human–human dyads, human–Internet, and two hu…
Am I Still Creative? The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Self‐Beliefs
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping society, highlighting the need to better understand its implications for human creativity. This investigation explores the relationship and differences between people's general creative self‐beliefs and their creative self‐beliefs in an AI‐specific context (i.e., while using AI tools). It further investigates the role played by AI‐specific creative self‐beliefs and AI‐augmented creative acti…
Are cooks more disgust sensitive? Preliminary examination of the food preparation hypothesis
Scaling the Creative Self
Self-report scales have become the most widely used instruments to capture people’s self-perception of creativity. Previous studies, however, provided only a limited insight into the psychometric properties of such measures. This paper reports an extensive item response theory (IRT) analysis of the Short Scale of Creative Self (SSCS): one of the most frequently used scales of creative self-concept. Based on samples from 14 studies (overall N > 26…
Democratizing Creativity by Enhancing Imagery and Agency
Creativity is a vital topic of various educational discourses, yet the support it receives within the school system is insufficient. This chapter focuses on four particular ways of making creativity more democratized, salient, and accessible in school settings. We start by exploring the educational benefits of egalitarian theoretical approaches to creativity. Then, we posit that democratization requires an equal focus on the cognitive aspects of …
Who” Is the Best Creative Thinking Partner? An Experimental Investigation of Human–Human, Human–Internet, and Human– AI Co‐Creation
Recent research suggests that working with generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, can produce more creative outcomes than humans alone. However, does AI retain its creative edge when humans have access to alternative information sources, such as another human or the internet. We explored this question in a between‐group experiment with 202 German participants across four conditions (human–human dyads, human–Internet, and two hu…
Am I Still Creative? The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Self‐Beliefs
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping society, highlighting the need to better understand its implications for human creativity. This investigation explores the relationship and differences between people's general creative self‐beliefs and their creative self‐beliefs in an AI‐specific context (i.e., while using AI tools). It further investigates the role played by AI‐specific creative self‐beliefs and AI‐augmented creative acti…
Self‐Regulation Prompts Improve Creative Performance
While people approach creative actions in diverse ways, navigating them effectively requires self‐regulatory effort. In this preregistered experiment, we examined whether simple self‐regulation prompts, provided across the stages of the creative process, make the outcomes more creative. Participants ( N = 332) engaged in one of three creativity tasks—designing a logo, writing a short story, or preparing a greeting card—and documented their ongoin…
Scaling the Creative Self
Self-report scales have become the most widely used instruments to capture people’s self-perception of creativity. Previous studies, however, provided only a limited insight into the psychometric properties of such measures. This paper reports an extensive item response theory (IRT) analysis of the Short Scale of Creative Self (SSCS): one of the most frequently used scales of creative self-concept. Based on samples from 14 studies (overall N > 26…
Democratizing Creativity by Enhancing Imagery and Agency
Creativity is a vital topic of various educational discourses, yet the support it receives within the school system is insufficient. This chapter focuses on four particular ways of making creativity more democratized, salient, and accessible in school settings. We start by exploring the educational benefits of egalitarian theoretical approaches to creativity. Then, we posit that democratization requires an equal focus on the cognitive aspects of …
Are cooks more disgust sensitive? Preliminary examination of the food preparation hypothesis
How do examples impact divergent thinking? The interplay between associative and executive processes
Self-regulation for creative activity
Condensing the Muses
Creative self-perceptions reflect a unique blend of motivational, metacognitive, and personal characteristics, both shaping and being shaped by people’s creative experiences. The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) is a domain-specific measure that captures people’s self-oriented views across five creativity domains: Everyday, Scholarly, Performance, Scientific, and Artistic. The scale’s complex, multidimensional structure comes with con…
Self‐Regulation Prompts Improve Creative Performance
While people approach creative actions in diverse ways, navigating them effectively requires self‐regulatory effort. In this preregistered experiment, we examined whether simple self‐regulation prompts, provided across the stages of the creative process, make the outcomes more creative. Participants ( N = 332) engaged in one of three creativity tasks—designing a logo, writing a short story, or preparing a greeting card—and documented their ongoin…
Who” Is the Best Creative Thinking Partner? An Experimental Investigation of Human–Human, Human–Internet, and Human– AI Co‐Creation
Recent research suggests that working with generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, can produce more creative outcomes than humans alone. However, does AI retain its creative edge when humans have access to alternative information sources, such as another human or the internet. We explored this question in a between‐group experiment with 202 German participants across four conditions (human–human dyads, human–Internet, and two hu…
Am I Still Creative? The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Self‐Beliefs
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping society, highlighting the need to better understand its implications for human creativity. This investigation explores the relationship and differences between people's general creative self‐beliefs and their creative self‐beliefs in an AI‐specific context (i.e., while using AI tools). It further investigates the role played by AI‐specific creative self‐beliefs and AI‐augmented creative acti…
The links between creativity and cognitive and affective empathy in a large sample of 8- and 9-year-old children
How cognition and metacognition interact in explaining creative confidence
Mapping creativity in the Pisa 2022 student and context questionnaires
Automated assessment of creativity in multilingual narratives
Researchers and educators interested in creative writing need a reliable and efficient tool to score the creativity of narratives, such as short stories. Typically, human raters manually assess narrative creativity, but such subjective scoring is limited by labor costs and rater disagreement. Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success on creativity tasks, yet they have not been applied to scoring narratives, including multilingual…
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (11 works) · Psychology (10 works) · Creativity (9 works) · Social Psychology (7 works) · Cognitive psychology (5 works) · Cognition (3 works) · Cognitive science (3 works) · Developmental psychology (3 works) · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works)