Aleksy Tarasenko‐Struc
Biographic Data
| ID | 5141444 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Aleksy Tarasenko‐Struc |
| GIVEN NAMES | Aleksy |
| FAMILY NAME | Tarasenko‐Struc |
| SIGNATURE | STRUC A T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Seton Hall University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Purely performative resuscitation
Despite its prevalence today, the practice of purely performative resuscitation (PPR)—paradigmatically, the “slow code”—has attracted more critics in bioethics than defenders. The most common criticism of the slow code is that it's fundamentally deceptive or harmful, while the most common justification offered is that it may benefit the patient's loved ones, by symbolically honoring the patient or the care team's relationship with the family. I a…
Dehumanization
Although it has become increasingly common to theorize about dehumanization, there is a lack of even basic agreement as to how to define the concept, nor is it clear why theorists should prefer one rival concept over another. So, which concept of dehumanization should we use? I propose that this question is best addressed by considering what the concept's function(s) might be, what the concept is for —specifically, which concern(s) the concept mi…
Humanism
Humanism is the view that people treat others inhumanely when we fail to see them as human beings, so that our treatment of them will tend to be more humane when we (fully) see their humanity. Recently, humanist views have been criticized on the grounds that the perpetrators of inhumanity regard their victims as human and treat them inhumanely partly for this reason. I argue that the two most common objections to humanist views (and their relativ…
Animalization
Although the concept of objectification is seen as a valuable tool in feminist theorizing, far less attention has been paid to animalization: treating or regarding a person as a nonhuman animal. I argue that animalization is a distinctive category of wrongdoing, modeling a theory of the phenomenon on Kantian theories of objectification in feminist philosophy. Actions are animalizing, I claim, when they embody a kind of disregard for a person's ch…
Objectification and Domination
I resolve a tension between two prominent strands of feminist social critique. On the first, the domination of women consists largely in their objectification, and the objectifying character of such domination primarily explains why it is wrong. On the second, some salient forms of domination have a distinctively intersubjective dimension that makes them crucially unlike our standard modes of relating to objects. Yet in that case, how could chara…
On Inhumanity
In this philosophically rich and distressingly timely work, David Livingstone Smith substantially expands upon and refines the theory of dehumanization offered in his book, Less Than Human, also written for a general audience. In the earlier piece, Smith had defined dehumanization as thinking of someone as subhuman rather than human—thinking of her as having an animal essence conjoined to a human appearance. And he argued, through an interpretati…
Kantian constructivism and the authority of others
I argue that Christine Korsgaard's Kantian constructivism cannot accommodate our obligations to others. Because she holds that all of our obligations are grounded in our obligating ourselves, she is committed to the view that our obligations to others are grounded in corresponding obligations to ourselves. Yet this conclusion is objectionable on substantive moral grounds. The problem is that she embraces an egocentric conception of authority, on …
Kantian constructivism and the authority of others
I argue that Christine Korsgaard's Kantian constructivism cannot accommodate our obligations to others. Because she holds that all of our obligations are grounded in our obligating ourselves, she is committed to the view that our obligations to others are grounded in corresponding obligations to ourselves. Yet this conclusion is objectionable on substantive moral grounds. The problem is that she embraces an egocentric conception of authority, on …
Kantian constructivism and the authority of others
I argue that Christine Korsgaard's Kantian constructivism cannot accommodate our obligations to others. Because she holds that all of our obligations are grounded in our obligating ourselves, she is committed to the view that our obligations to others are grounded in corresponding obligations to ourselves. Yet this conclusion is objectionable on substantive moral grounds. The problem is that she embraces an egocentric conception of authority, on …
Objectification and Domination
I resolve a tension between two prominent strands of feminist social critique. On the first, the domination of women consists largely in their objectification, and the objectifying character of such domination primarily explains why it is wrong. On the second, some salient forms of domination have a distinctively intersubjective dimension that makes them crucially unlike our standard modes of relating to objects. Yet in that case, how could chara…
On Inhumanity
In this philosophically rich and distressingly timely work, David Livingstone Smith substantially expands upon and refines the theory of dehumanization offered in his book, Less Than Human, also written for a general audience. In the earlier piece, Smith had defined dehumanization as thinking of someone as subhuman rather than human—thinking of her as having an animal essence conjoined to a human appearance. And he argued, through an interpretati…
Humanism
Humanism is the view that people treat others inhumanely when we fail to see them as human beings, so that our treatment of them will tend to be more humane when we (fully) see their humanity. Recently, humanist views have been criticized on the grounds that the perpetrators of inhumanity regard their victims as human and treat them inhumanely partly for this reason. I argue that the two most common objections to humanist views (and their relativ…
Animalization
Although the concept of objectification is seen as a valuable tool in feminist theorizing, far less attention has been paid to animalization: treating or regarding a person as a nonhuman animal. I argue that animalization is a distinctive category of wrongdoing, modeling a theory of the phenomenon on Kantian theories of objectification in feminist philosophy. Actions are animalizing, I claim, when they embody a kind of disregard for a person's ch…
Purely performative resuscitation
Despite its prevalence today, the practice of purely performative resuscitation (PPR)—paradigmatically, the “slow code”—has attracted more critics in bioethics than defenders. The most common criticism of the slow code is that it's fundamentally deceptive or harmful, while the most common justification offered is that it may benefit the patient's loved ones, by symbolically honoring the patient or the care team's relationship with the family. I a…
Dehumanization
Although it has become increasingly common to theorize about dehumanization, there is a lack of even basic agreement as to how to define the concept, nor is it clear why theorists should prefer one rival concept over another. So, which concept of dehumanization should we use? I propose that this question is best addressed by considering what the concept's function(s) might be, what the concept is for —specifically, which concern(s) the concept mi…
Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Political science (3 works) · Anthropology (2 works) · Dehumanization (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 works) · Politics (2 works)