Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Brian A Chance

Biographic Data

ID5143640
NAMEBrian A Chance
GIVEN NAMESBrian A
FAMILY NAMEChance
SIGNATURECHANCE B A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Oklahoma
ORCID0000-0002-9798-3650
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS6
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX2
  • Kant’s Letter to Fichte, the Pure Intellect and his ‘All-Crushing’ Metaphysics

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2022

    I raise three questions relevant to De Boer’s overall project in Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics . The first is whether Kant’s 1799 open letter to Fichte supports or threatens her contention that Kant had an abiding interest in developing a reformed metaphysics from 1781 onwards. The second is whether De Boer’s conception of the pure intellect and its place in Kant’s projected system of metaphysics captures the role of pure sensibility in the Analyt…

  • Kant and the enhancement debate

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2021

    This essay develops a Kantian approach to the permissibility of biomedical physical, cognitive, and moral enhancement. Kant holds that human beings have an imperfect duty to promote their physical, cognitive, and moral perfection. While an agent’s individual circumstances may limit the means she may permissibly use to enhance herself, whether biomedically or otherwise, I argue (1) that biomedical means of enhancing oneself are, generally speaking…

  • Kantian Non-Evidentialism and its German Antecedents

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2019

    This article aims to highlight the extent to which Kant’s account of belief draws on the views of his contemporaries. Situating the non-evidentialist features of Crusius’ account of belief within his broader account, I argue that they include antecedents to both Kant’s distinction between pragmatic and moral belief and his conception of a postulate of pure practical reason. While moving us closer to Kant’s arguments for the first postulate, howev…

  • K ant and the Discipline of Reason

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•European Journal of Philosophy•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 12

    K ant's notion of ‘discipline’ has received considerable attention from scholars of his philosophy of education, but its role in his theoretical philosophy has been largely ignored. This omission is surprising since his discussion of discipline in the first C ritique is not only more extensive and expansive in scope than his other discussions but also predates them. The goal of this essay is to provide a comprehensive reading of the D iscipline t…

  • Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic

    Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    Kant's response to scepticism in the Critique of Pure Reason is complex and remarkably nuanced, although it is rarely recognized as such. In this paper, I argue that recent attempts to flesh out the details of this response by Paul Guyer and Michael Forster do not go far enough. Although they are right to draw a distinction between Humean and Pyrrhonian scepticism and locate Kant's response to the latter in the Transcendental Dialectic, their acc…

  • Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2011

    Hume's account of causation is often regarded a challenge Kant must overcome if the Critical philosophy is to be successful. But from Kant's time to the present, Hume's denial of our ability to cognize supersensible objects, a denial that relies heavily on his account of causation, has also been regarded as a forerunner to Kant's critique of metaphysics. After identifying reasons for rejecting Wayne Waxman's recent account of Kant's debt to Hume,…

  • K ant and the Discipline of Reason

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•European Journal of Philosophy•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 12

    K ant's notion of ‘discipline’ has received considerable attention from scholars of his philosophy of education, but its role in his theoretical philosophy has been largely ignored. This omission is surprising since his discussion of discipline in the first C ritique is not only more extensive and expansive in scope than his other discussions but also predates them. The goal of this essay is to provide a comprehensive reading of the D iscipline t…

  • Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic

    Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    Kant's response to scepticism in the Critique of Pure Reason is complex and remarkably nuanced, although it is rarely recognized as such. In this paper, I argue that recent attempts to flesh out the details of this response by Paul Guyer and Michael Forster do not go far enough. Although they are right to draw a distinction between Humean and Pyrrhonian scepticism and locate Kant's response to the latter in the Transcendental Dialectic, their acc…

  • Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2011

    Hume's account of causation is often regarded a challenge Kant must overcome if the Critical philosophy is to be successful. But from Kant's time to the present, Hume's denial of our ability to cognize supersensible objects, a denial that relies heavily on his account of causation, has also been regarded as a forerunner to Kant's critique of metaphysics. After identifying reasons for rejecting Wayne Waxman's recent account of Kant's debt to Hume,…

  • Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic

    Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2012•Cited by: 2•References: 16

    Kant's response to scepticism in the Critique of Pure Reason is complex and remarkably nuanced, although it is rarely recognized as such. In this paper, I argue that recent attempts to flesh out the details of this response by Paul Guyer and Michael Forster do not go far enough. Although they are right to draw a distinction between Humean and Pyrrhonian scepticism and locate Kant's response to the latter in the Transcendental Dialectic, their acc…

  • K ant and the Discipline of Reason

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•European Journal of Philosophy•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 12

    K ant's notion of ‘discipline’ has received considerable attention from scholars of his philosophy of education, but its role in his theoretical philosophy has been largely ignored. This omission is surprising since his discussion of discipline in the first C ritique is not only more extensive and expansive in scope than his other discussions but also predates them. The goal of this essay is to provide a comprehensive reading of the D iscipline t…

  • Kantian Non-Evidentialism and its German Antecedents

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2019

    This article aims to highlight the extent to which Kant’s account of belief draws on the views of his contemporaries. Situating the non-evidentialist features of Crusius’ account of belief within his broader account, I argue that they include antecedents to both Kant’s distinction between pragmatic and moral belief and his conception of a postulate of pure practical reason. While moving us closer to Kant’s arguments for the first postulate, howev…

  • Kant and the enhancement debate

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2021

    This essay develops a Kantian approach to the permissibility of biomedical physical, cognitive, and moral enhancement. Kant holds that human beings have an imperfect duty to promote their physical, cognitive, and moral perfection. While an agent’s individual circumstances may limit the means she may permissibly use to enhance herself, whether biomedically or otherwise, I argue (1) that biomedical means of enhancing oneself are, generally speaking…

  • Kant’s Letter to Fichte, the Pure Intellect and his ‘All-Crushing’ Metaphysics

    Open Access•Brian A Chance•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2022

    I raise three questions relevant to De Boer’s overall project in Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics . The first is whether Kant’s 1799 open letter to Fichte supports or threatens her contention that Kant had an abiding interest in developing a reformed metaphysics from 1781 onwards. The second is whether De Boer’s conception of the pure intellect and its place in Kant’s projected system of metaphysics captures the role of pure sensibility in the Analyt…

Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Metaphysics (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae