Ołena Łucyszyna
Biographic Data
| ID | 5184730 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ołena Łucyszyna |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ołena |
| FAMILY NAME | Łucyszyna |
| SIGNATURE | ŁUCYSZYNA O |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Humanities and Economics in Lodz |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6972-649X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Yuktidīpikā on Yogins’ Perception
Sām.khya’s Standpoint in the Disagreement on Whether Cognitions Have a Form (ākāra)
Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result
Sāṃkhya, in its commentary Yuktidīpikā , responds to the Buddhist claim that a means of valid cognition ( pramāṇa ) and a valid cognition ( pramā ), its result ( phala ), are identical. The response of Sāṃkhya was pioneering: it is one of the two earliest responses to the Buddhists in the lively polemic on the relationship between a pramāṇa and its result. (The other of these two earliest responses is in the Ślokavārttika by Kumārila Bhaṭṭa.) Sāṃ…
The scope of the pramāṇa s in classical and postclassical Sāṃkhya
One of the lively polemics between Buddhists and Naiyāyikas is devoted to the question of whether each pramāṇa—means of knowledge—has an independent scope of validity, which does not overlap the scopes of other pramāṇas, or whether more than one pramāṇa can be applied to the same object. Dignāga and continuators of his thought defend pramāṇa-vyavasthā, ‘autonomy of [the object spheres of] pramāṇas,’ while Naiyāyikas defend the opposing conception…
Sāṃkhya on the Validity (prāmāṇya) and Invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of Cognition
One of the well-known polemics of Indian thought, in which many darśanas participated, is concerned with the problem of the validity (prāmāṇya) and invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of cognition (jñāna). The problem has two main aspects: the origination and ascertainment of validity and invalidity. Mādhava’s Sarvadarśanasaṃgraha and other external sources attribute to Sāṃkhya (a tradition of thought recognising the authority of the Vedas) the view that both…
The Yuktidīpikā on the Origin of the Vedas
In this article, I reconstruct the view of the Yuktidīpikā , the most detailed and profound commentary of classical Sāṃkhya, on the origin of the Vedas. A close reading of the text reveals that its unknown author wavered between at least two different views on this issue. The first view is that the authorless but noneternal Vedas evolve from prakṛti (primordial matter) at the beginning of a new cycle of existence of the world ( kalpa ) and merge …
On the Notion of Linguistic Convention (saṁketa) in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya
The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of the term saṁketa, which is usually translated as ‘(linguistic) convention’, in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya, the first and the most authoritative commentary to the Yogasūtras. This paper is a contribution to the reconstruction of the classical Yoga view on the relation between word and its meaning, for saṁketa is a key term used by this darśana in discussing this relation. The textual analysis of the Yoga…
Classical Sāṁkhya on the Relationship between a Word and Its Meaning
The aim of this article is to reconstruct the classical Sāṁkhya view on the relationship between a word and its meaning. The study embraces all the extant texts of classical Sāṁkhya, but it is based mainly on the Yuktidīpikā, since this commentary contains most of the fragments which are directly related to the topic of our research. The textual analysis has led me to the following conclusion. It is possible to reconstruct two different and confl…
Classical Sāṁkhya on the Relationship between a Word and Its Meaning
The aim of this article is to reconstruct the classical Sāṁkhya view on the relationship between a word and its meaning. The study embraces all the extant texts of classical Sāṁkhya, but it is based mainly on the Yuktidīpikā, since this commentary contains most of the fragments which are directly related to the topic of our research. The textual analysis has led me to the following conclusion. It is possible to reconstruct two different and confl…
On the Notion of Linguistic Convention (saṁketa) in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya
The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of the term saṁketa, which is usually translated as ‘(linguistic) convention’, in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya, the first and the most authoritative commentary to the Yogasūtras. This paper is a contribution to the reconstruction of the classical Yoga view on the relation between word and its meaning, for saṁketa is a key term used by this darśana in discussing this relation. The textual analysis of the Yoga…
Classical Sāṁkhya on the Relationship between a Word and Its Meaning
The aim of this article is to reconstruct the classical Sāṁkhya view on the relationship between a word and its meaning. The study embraces all the extant texts of classical Sāṁkhya, but it is based mainly on the Yuktidīpikā, since this commentary contains most of the fragments which are directly related to the topic of our research. The textual analysis has led me to the following conclusion. It is possible to reconstruct two different and confl…
On the Notion of Linguistic Convention (saṁketa) in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya
The aim of this study is to clarify the meaning of the term saṁketa, which is usually translated as ‘(linguistic) convention’, in the Yogasūtrabhāṣya, the first and the most authoritative commentary to the Yogasūtras. This paper is a contribution to the reconstruction of the classical Yoga view on the relation between word and its meaning, for saṁketa is a key term used by this darśana in discussing this relation. The textual analysis of the Yoga…
The Yuktidīpikā on the Origin of the Vedas
In this article, I reconstruct the view of the Yuktidīpikā , the most detailed and profound commentary of classical Sāṃkhya, on the origin of the Vedas. A close reading of the text reveals that its unknown author wavered between at least two different views on this issue. The first view is that the authorless but noneternal Vedas evolve from prakṛti (primordial matter) at the beginning of a new cycle of existence of the world ( kalpa ) and merge …
The scope of the pramāṇa s in classical and postclassical Sāṃkhya
One of the lively polemics between Buddhists and Naiyāyikas is devoted to the question of whether each pramāṇa—means of knowledge—has an independent scope of validity, which does not overlap the scopes of other pramāṇas, or whether more than one pramāṇa can be applied to the same object. Dignāga and continuators of his thought defend pramāṇa-vyavasthā, ‘autonomy of [the object spheres of] pramāṇas,’ while Naiyāyikas defend the opposing conception…
Sāṃkhya on the Validity (prāmāṇya) and Invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of Cognition
One of the well-known polemics of Indian thought, in which many darśanas participated, is concerned with the problem of the validity (prāmāṇya) and invalidity (aprāmāṇya) of cognition (jñāna). The problem has two main aspects: the origination and ascertainment of validity and invalidity. Mādhava’s Sarvadarśanasaṃgraha and other external sources attribute to Sāṃkhya (a tradition of thought recognising the authority of the Vedas) the view that both…
Sām.ṃkhya’s Challenge to the Buddhist Claim of the Identity of a Pramān.ṇa and Its Result
Sāṃkhya, in its commentary Yuktidīpikā , responds to the Buddhist claim that a means of valid cognition ( pramāṇa ) and a valid cognition ( pramā ), its result ( phala ), are identical. The response of Sāṃkhya was pioneering: it is one of the two earliest responses to the Buddhists in the lively polemic on the relationship between a pramāṇa and its result. (The other of these two earliest responses is in the Ślokavārttika by Kumārila Bhaṭṭa.) Sāṃ…
The Yuktidīpikā on Yogins’ Perception
Sām.khya’s Standpoint in the Disagreement on Whether Cognitions Have a Form (ākāra)
Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 works) · Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Cognition (3 works) · Eurasian Exchange Networks (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works)