Maja Graso
Biographic Data
| ID | 5222238 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Maja Graso |
| GIVEN NAMES | Maja |
| FAMILY NAME | Graso |
| SIGNATURE | GRASO M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Groningen |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-1504-5896 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 12 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Just, Now: How and When Mindfulness Relates to Justice Enactment Through Moral Potency Under Increasing Workloads
Accountability-embracing science communication increases public engagement with scientists post-Covid-19
The COVID-19 pandemic marked a significant turning point in public engagement with science, with conservatives exhibiting a more pronounced decline than liberals. Just as the pandemic intensified polarization, we reasoned that post-crisis reflection could offer an opportunity to repair these divides by shaping future public engagement with scientists. Drawing on boundary work theory and classic research on one-sided versus two-sided messaging, we…
More solutions, more problems
A case for de-diagnosis of harms in the social and behavioral sciences
Behavioral and social scientists are skilled at diagnosing harms in our collectives – we investigate and label discrimination, exclusion, and marginalization. But how skilled are we at knowing when to stop? Identifying more harms is not necessarily better, so we maintain that the well-being of individuals and collectives requires diagnosing harm when appropriate, but also occasionally revisiting the value of those diagnoses and, when necessary, r…
Blaming the unvaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic: The roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA
Individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 (C19) experienced prejudice and blame for the pandemic. Because people vastly overestimate C19 risks, we examined whether these negative judgements could be partially understood as a form of scapegoating (ie, blaming a group unfairly for an undesirable outcome) and whether political ideology (previously shown to shape risk perceptions in the USA) moderates scapegoating of the unvaccinated. We grounded our…
Boundaries of civility promotion in education and leadership
Worth the Risk? Greater Acceptance of Instrumental Harm Befalling Men than Women
Scientific and organizational interventions often involve trade-offs whereby they benefit some but entail costs to others (i.e., instrumental harm; IH). We hypothesized that the gender of the persons incurring those costs would influence intervention endorsement, such that people would more readily support interventions inflicting IH onto men than onto women. We also hypothesized that women would exhibit greater asymmetries in their acceptance of…
Perceived fairness of faculty governance: A study of 51 countries
Organizational justice enactment: An agent-focused review and path forward
Moralization of Covid-19 health response: Asymmetry in tolerance for human costs
Organizational Justice Comes of Age: Review of the Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace Edited by Russell Cropanzano and Maureen Ambrose
Cross-level effects of procedural justice perceptions on faculty trust
The progression in the organisational justice literature has extended beyond the individual employee level towards recognising the importance of one's work unit and its potential to affect individual reactions to unfairness. This study contributes to existing multilevel justice research by assessing whether aggregate (i.e. unit-level) fairness perceptions influence the relationship between individuals' perceived violation of procedural justice an…
Moralization of Covid-19 health response: Asymmetry in tolerance for human costs
Worth the Risk? Greater Acceptance of Instrumental Harm Befalling Men than Women
Scientific and organizational interventions often involve trade-offs whereby they benefit some but entail costs to others (i.e., instrumental harm; IH). We hypothesized that the gender of the persons incurring those costs would influence intervention endorsement, such that people would more readily support interventions inflicting IH onto men than onto women. We also hypothesized that women would exhibit greater asymmetries in their acceptance of…
Organizational Justice Comes of Age: Review of the Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace Edited by Russell Cropanzano and Maureen Ambrose
Cross-level effects of procedural justice perceptions on faculty trust
The progression in the organisational justice literature has extended beyond the individual employee level towards recognising the importance of one's work unit and its potential to affect individual reactions to unfairness. This study contributes to existing multilevel justice research by assessing whether aggregate (i.e. unit-level) fairness perceptions influence the relationship between individuals' perceived violation of procedural justice an…
Cross-level effects of procedural justice perceptions on faculty trust
The progression in the organisational justice literature has extended beyond the individual employee level towards recognising the importance of one's work unit and its potential to affect individual reactions to unfairness. This study contributes to existing multilevel justice research by assessing whether aggregate (i.e. unit-level) fairness perceptions influence the relationship between individuals' perceived violation of procedural justice an…
Organizational Justice Comes of Age: Review of the Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace Edited by Russell Cropanzano and Maureen Ambrose
Organizational justice enactment: An agent-focused review and path forward
Moralization of Covid-19 health response: Asymmetry in tolerance for human costs
Perceived fairness of faculty governance: A study of 51 countries
Boundaries of civility promotion in education and leadership
Worth the Risk? Greater Acceptance of Instrumental Harm Befalling Men than Women
Scientific and organizational interventions often involve trade-offs whereby they benefit some but entail costs to others (i.e., instrumental harm; IH). We hypothesized that the gender of the persons incurring those costs would influence intervention endorsement, such that people would more readily support interventions inflicting IH onto men than onto women. We also hypothesized that women would exhibit greater asymmetries in their acceptance of…
Blaming the unvaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic: The roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA
Individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 (C19) experienced prejudice and blame for the pandemic. Because people vastly overestimate C19 risks, we examined whether these negative judgements could be partially understood as a form of scapegoating (ie, blaming a group unfairly for an undesirable outcome) and whether political ideology (previously shown to shape risk perceptions in the USA) moderates scapegoating of the unvaccinated. We grounded our…
Just, Now: How and When Mindfulness Relates to Justice Enactment Through Moral Potency Under Increasing Workloads
Accountability-embracing science communication increases public engagement with scientists post-Covid-19
The COVID-19 pandemic marked a significant turning point in public engagement with science, with conservatives exhibiting a more pronounced decline than liberals. Just as the pandemic intensified polarization, we reasoned that post-crisis reflection could offer an opportunity to repair these divides by shaping future public engagement with scientists. Drawing on boundary work theory and classic research on one-sided versus two-sided messaging, we…
More solutions, more problems
A case for de-diagnosis of harms in the social and behavioral sciences
Behavioral and social scientists are skilled at diagnosing harms in our collectives – we investigate and label discrimination, exclusion, and marginalization. But how skilled are we at knowing when to stop? Identifying more harms is not necessarily better, so we maintain that the well-being of individuals and collectives requires diagnosing harm when appropriate, but also occasionally revisiting the value of those diagnoses and, when necessary, r…
Political science (7 works) · Psychology (7 works) · Law (5 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Economic Justice (4 works) · Criminology (3 works) · Harm (3 works) · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 works) · Organizational justice (3 works)