Suniti Kumar Ghosh
Biographic Data
| ID | 5242545 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Suniti Kumar Ghosh |
| GIVEN NAMES | Suniti Kumar |
| FAMILY NAME | Ghosh |
| SIGNATURE | GHOSH S K |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1983 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1985 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
On the transfer of power in India
The transfer of power in India in 1947 brought a sense of “fulfillment” to the three parties to the settlement—the British raj, the Congress and the Muslim League. British Prime Minister Clement Attlee declared that it was “not the abdication but the fulfillment of Britain's mission in India, a sign of strength, and the vitality of the British Commonwealth.” Speaking on the Indian Independence Bill in the House of Lords, Lord Samuel, a Liberal le…
Marx on India
Marxists and others who have written in detail or just touched on what Marx said about India are almost unanimous in assuming that his writings of the 1850s on India, especially his statement that the British rule in India was fulfilling a double mission—a mission destructive as well as regenerating—were his last word on the subject. While some of them agree with the Marx of the 1850s, others disagree and criticize him. Among the former are R. Pa…
The Indian Bourgeoisie and imperialism
In his article “The Problem of India” (Monthly Review, February 1981) Lawrence Lifschultz approvingly cited the following lines from Dilip Hiro: By the late 1960s, the Congress [Indian National Congress] had played out its historically progressive role: a successful challenge to the foreign imperialistic capital on behalf of the indigenous capital; and substitution or supplanting of the large absentee, feudal ownership in agriculture with directl…
The Indian Bourgeoisie and imperialism
In his article “The Problem of India” (Monthly Review, February 1981) Lawrence Lifschultz approvingly cited the following lines from Dilip Hiro: By the late 1960s, the Congress [Indian National Congress] had played out its historically progressive role: a successful challenge to the foreign imperialistic capital on behalf of the indigenous capital; and substitution or supplanting of the large absentee, feudal ownership in agriculture with directl…
Marx on India
Marxists and others who have written in detail or just touched on what Marx said about India are almost unanimous in assuming that his writings of the 1850s on India, especially his statement that the British rule in India was fulfilling a double mission—a mission destructive as well as regenerating—were his last word on the subject. While some of them agree with the Marx of the 1850s, others disagree and criticize him. Among the former are R. Pa…
The Indian Bourgeoisie and imperialism
In his article “The Problem of India” (Monthly Review, February 1981) Lawrence Lifschultz approvingly cited the following lines from Dilip Hiro: By the late 1960s, the Congress [Indian National Congress] had played out its historically progressive role: a successful challenge to the foreign imperialistic capital on behalf of the indigenous capital; and substitution or supplanting of the large absentee, feudal ownership in agriculture with directl…
Marx on India
Marxists and others who have written in detail or just touched on what Marx said about India are almost unanimous in assuming that his writings of the 1850s on India, especially his statement that the British rule in India was fulfilling a double mission—a mission destructive as well as regenerating—were his last word on the subject. While some of them agree with the Marx of the 1850s, others disagree and criticize him. Among the former are R. Pa…
On the transfer of power in India
The transfer of power in India in 1947 brought a sense of “fulfillment” to the three parties to the settlement—the British raj, the Congress and the Muslim League. British Prime Minister Clement Attlee declared that it was “not the abdication but the fulfillment of Britain's mission in India, a sign of strength, and the vitality of the British Commonwealth.” Speaking on the Indian Independence Bill in the House of Lords, Lord Samuel, a Liberal le…
History (3 works) · Economic history (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Abdication (1 work) · Agriculture (1 work)