The Indian Bourgeoisie and imperialism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8414714 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suniti Kumar Ghosh (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 2-17 |
| Publication date | 1983-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-4810 • E-ISSN: 1472-6033 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14672715.1983.10404879 |
| OpenAlex | W2330368075 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 14 |
In his article “The Problem of India” (Monthly Review, February 1981) Lawrence Lifschultz approvingly cited the following lines from Dilip Hiro: By the late 1960s, the Congress [Indian National Congress] had played out its historically progressive role: a successful challenge to the foreign imperialistic capital on behalf of the indigenous capital; and substitution or supplanting of the large absentee, feudal ownership in agriculture with directly managed landlordship or “self-cultivating” ownership by rich peasants
Agriculture · Ancient history · Archaeology · Bourgeoisie · Capital (architecture · Development economics · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Feudalism · Indigenous · Political economy · Political science · History · Indian Economic and Social Development · Law · Social and Economic Development in India
Economic Growth Strategy and Urbanization Policies in China, 1949-1982
Identity development and cultural production in the Chinese diaspora to the United States, 1850–2004
The bretton woods institutions and Concerned Asian scholarship
Labour Migration, Capitalist Accumulation, and Feudal Reproduction
A mode of production flux
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.15 |
| Citation span | 1992 - 2019 (28) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |