Erin Driver‐Linn
Biographic Data
| ID | 5379535 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Erin Driver‐Linn |
| GIVEN NAMES | Erin |
| FAMILY NAME | Driver‐Linn |
| SIGNATURE | LINN E D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Harvard University Press |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 31 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Sources of Comfort and Change in This "Would-Be" Science
Responds to comments made by numerous authors (see records 2004-14303-014, 2004-14303-015, and 2004-14303-016) on the current author's original article (see record 2003-05602-002), which presented an account of why psychologists have almost continuously invoked Kuhn since the 1970s to justify a wide array of the discipline's historical developments and epistemological proclivities. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
Self-deception and failure to modulate responses despite accruing evidence of error
Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists' use of Kuhn
Psychologists' appropriation of language and ideas from Thomas Kuhn's (1962, 1970b) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions reveals deep and contradictory concerns about truth, science, and the progress of the field. The author argues that psychologists, uncomfortably straddling natural and social science traditions, reference Structure for 2 reasons largely overlooked: first, because it presents an intermediate, naturalistic position in the war …
Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists' use of Kuhn
Psychologists' appropriation of language and ideas from Thomas Kuhn's (1962, 1970b) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions reveals deep and contradictory concerns about truth, science, and the progress of the field. The author argues that psychologists, uncomfortably straddling natural and social science traditions, reference Structure for 2 reasons largely overlooked: first, because it presents an intermediate, naturalistic position in the war …
Self-deception and failure to modulate responses despite accruing evidence of error
Self-deception and failure to modulate responses despite accruing evidence of error
Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists' use of Kuhn
Psychologists' appropriation of language and ideas from Thomas Kuhn's (1962, 1970b) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions reveals deep and contradictory concerns about truth, science, and the progress of the field. The author argues that psychologists, uncomfortably straddling natural and social science traditions, reference Structure for 2 reasons largely overlooked: first, because it presents an intermediate, naturalistic position in the war …
Sources of Comfort and Change in This "Would-Be" Science
Responds to comments made by numerous authors (see records 2004-14303-014, 2004-14303-015, and 2004-14303-016) on the current author's original article (see record 2003-05602-002), which presented an account of why psychologists have almost continuously invoked Kuhn since the 1970s to justify a wide array of the discipline's historical developments and epistemological proclivities. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 works) · Psychological science (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Representations and Identity (2 works)