Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Julia G Stapels

Biographic Data

ID5448654
NAMEJulia G Stapels
GIVEN NAMESJulia G
FAMILY NAMEStapels
SIGNATURESTAPELS J G
AFFILIATIONSBielefeld University
ORCID0000-0003-1347-9607
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0
  • Torn Between Love and Hate

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Friederike Eyssel•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2024

    Robots are a source of evaluative conflict and thus elicit ambivalence. In fact, psychological research has shown across domains that people simultaneously report strong positive and strong negative evaluations about one and the same attitude object. This is defined as ambivalence. In the current research, we extended existing ambivalence research by measuring ambivalence towards various robot-related stimuli using explicit (i.e., self-report) an…

  • Never Trust Anything That Can Think for Itself, if You Can’t Control Its Privacy Settings

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Angelika A Augustine et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2023

    When encountering social robots, potential users are often facing a dilemma between privacy and utility. That is, high utility often comes at the cost of lenient privacy settings, allowing the robot to store personal data and to connect to the internet permanently, which brings in associated data security risks. However, to date, it still remains unclear how this dilemma affects attitudes and behavioral intentions towards the respective robot. To…

  • Robocalypse? Yes, Please! The Role of Robot Autonomy in the Development of Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Friederike Eyssel•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2022

    Attitudes towards robots are not always unequivocally positive or negative: when attitudes encompass both strong positive and strong negative evaluations about an attitude object, people experience an unpleasant state of evaluative conflict, called ambivalence. To shed light on ambivalence towards robots, we conducted a mixed-methods experiment with N = 163 German university students that investigated the influence of robot autonomy on robot-rela…

  • Too close to call

    Open Access•Iris K Schneider, Julia G Stapels et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019•References: 13

No prominent works on this page.

  • Too close to call

    Open Access•Iris K Schneider, Julia G Stapels et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019•References: 13

  • Robocalypse? Yes, Please! The Role of Robot Autonomy in the Development of Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Friederike Eyssel•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2022

    Attitudes towards robots are not always unequivocally positive or negative: when attitudes encompass both strong positive and strong negative evaluations about an attitude object, people experience an unpleasant state of evaluative conflict, called ambivalence. To shed light on ambivalence towards robots, we conducted a mixed-methods experiment with N = 163 German university students that investigated the influence of robot autonomy on robot-rela…

  • Never Trust Anything That Can Think for Itself, if You Can’t Control Its Privacy Settings

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Angelika A Augustine et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2023

    When encountering social robots, potential users are often facing a dilemma between privacy and utility. That is, high utility often comes at the cost of lenient privacy settings, allowing the robot to store personal data and to connect to the internet permanently, which brings in associated data security risks. However, to date, it still remains unclear how this dilemma affects attitudes and behavioral intentions towards the respective robot. To…

  • Torn Between Love and Hate

    Open Access•Julia G Stapels, Friederike Eyssel•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2024

    Robots are a source of evaluative conflict and thus elicit ambivalence. In fact, psychological research has shown across domains that people simultaneously report strong positive and strong negative evaluations about one and the same attitude object. This is defined as ambivalence. In the current research, we extended existing ambivalence research by measuring ambivalence towards various robot-related stimuli using explicit (i.e., self-report) an…

Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Robot (3 works) · Ambivalence (2 works) · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works) · Art (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae