Robocalypse? Yes, Please! The Role of Robot Autonomy in the Development of Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21199858 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia G Stapels (0000-0003-1347-9607, Bielefeld University, corresponding author), Friederike Eyssel (0000-0002-4978-8922, Bielefeld University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 683-697 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-021-00817-2 |
| PMID | 34413912 |
| OpenAlex | W3196270322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 55 |
Attitudes towards robots are not always unequivocally positive or negative: when attitudes encompass both strong positive and strong negative evaluations about an attitude object, people experience an unpleasant state of evaluative conflict, called ambivalence. To shed light on ambivalence towards robots, we conducted a mixed-methods experiment with N = 163 German university students that investigated the influence of robot autonomy on robot-related attitudes. With technological progress, robots become increasingly autonomous. We hypothesized that high levels of robot autonomy would increase both positive and negative robot-related evaluations, resulting in more attitudinal ambivalence. We experimentally manipulated robot autonomy through text vignettes and assessed objective ambivalence (i.e., the amount of reported conflicting thoughts and feelings) and subjective ambivalence (i.e., self-reported experienced conflict) towards the robot ‘VIVA’ using qualitative and quantitative measures. Autonomy did not impact objective ambivalence. However, subjective ambivalence was higher towards the robot high versus low in autonomy. Interestingly, this effect turned non-significant when controlling for individual differences in technology commitment. Qualitative results were categorized by two independent raters into assets (e.g., assistance, companionship) and risks (e.g., privacy/data security, social isolation). Taken together, the present research demonstrated that attitudes towards robots are indeed ambivalent and that this ambivalence might influence behavioral intentions towards robots. Moreover, the findings highlight the important role of technology commitment. Finally, qualitative results shed light on potential users’ concerns and aspirations. This way, these data provide useful insights into factors that facilitate human–robot research
Ambivalence · Autonomy · Feeling · Political science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Robot · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public
Transparent robots
Designing Socially Assistive Robots for Perinatal Depression Screening
A Meta-Analysis of Vulnerability and Trust in Human–Robot Interaction
The Role of Robot Competence, Autonomy, and Personality on Trust Formation in Human–Robot Interaction
Improving evaluations of advanced robots by depicting them in harmful situations
Torn Between Love and Hate
Autonomous Systems and Technology Resistance
(Un)Intended Consequences of Social Robot Adoption in Aged Care
Never Trust Anything That Can Think for Itself, if You Can’t Control Its Privacy Settings
The clock is ticking
Ambivalence is Everywhere
Contagious humans
Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction
Loneliness around the world
Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships
The Agony of Ambivalence and Ways to Resolve It
Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Attitudes and Attitude Change
Robots are friends as well as foes
Learning with Educational Companion Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application Potentials for Education Robots
Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions
Alone together
Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures
The gradual threshold model of ambivalence
Let’s not be indifferent about neutrality
Meta-analytic evidence for ambivalence resolution as a key process in effortless self-control
Case Report
Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people
Great Expectations? Relation of Previous Experiences With Social Robots in Real Life or in the Media and Expectancies Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment
To Err is Human(-like)
From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations
The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect
The revised Ucla Loneliness Scale
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots
On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |