Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

CLIFF DACSO

Biographic Data

ID5522597
NAMECLIFF DACSO
GIVEN NAMESCLIFF
FAMILY NAMEDACSO
SIGNATUREDACSO C
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS1
TOTAL CITATIONS8
AUTHOR COUNT1
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
H-INDEX1
  • What Makes a Good Decision? Robust Satisficing as a Normative Standard of Rational Decision Making

    Open Access•Barry Schwartz, Yakov Ben‐Haim et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 39

    Most decisions in life involve ambiguity, where probabilities can not be meaningfully specified, as much as they involve probabilistic uncertainty. In such conditions, the aspiration to utility maximization may be self‐deceptive. We propose “robust satisficing” as an alternative to utility maximizing as the normative standard for rational decision making in such circumstances. Instead of seeking to maximize the expected value, or utility, of a de…

  • What Makes a Good Decision? Robust Satisficing as a Normative Standard of Rational Decision Making

    Open Access•Barry Schwartz, Yakov Ben‐Haim et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 39

    Most decisions in life involve ambiguity, where probabilities can not be meaningfully specified, as much as they involve probabilistic uncertainty. In such conditions, the aspiration to utility maximization may be self‐deceptive. We propose “robust satisficing” as an alternative to utility maximizing as the normative standard for rational decision making in such circumstances. Instead of seeking to maximize the expected value, or utility, of a de…

  • What Makes a Good Decision? Robust Satisficing as a Normative Standard of Rational Decision Making

    Open Access•Barry Schwartz, Yakov Ben‐Haim et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2010•Cited by: 8•References: 39

    Most decisions in life involve ambiguity, where probabilities can not be meaningfully specified, as much as they involve probabilistic uncertainty. In such conditions, the aspiration to utility maximization may be self‐deceptive. We propose “robust satisficing” as an alternative to utility maximizing as the normative standard for rational decision making in such circumstances. Instead of seeking to maximize the expected value, or utility, of a de…

Ambiguity (1 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Decision theory (1 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 works) · Economics (1 works) · Expected utility hypothesis (1 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 works) · Mathematical economics (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae