Harriet R Braswell
Biographic Data
| ID | 5545356 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Harriet R Braswell |
| GIVEN NAMES | Harriet R |
| FAMILY NAME | Braswell |
| SIGNATURE | BRASWELL H R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Johns Hopkins University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Assessing depression outcomes in group practice clinics
The application of a protocol for the initial assessment of medical care outcomes of geriatric depression management in four multispecialty group practice clinics is described. The clinical findings of this study are limited, but the protocol for the assessment of depression outcomes was found to be feasible, practical and acceptable in all four clinics. The success of the study has positive implications both for improving management of depressed…
Validity of Medical Staff Judgments in Establishing Quality Assurance Priorities
The validation of a structured group judgment procedure to establish priorities for quality assurance activities was undertaken in six medical institutions in the United States. Validation focused on the extent to which health improvement could be documented by outcome-based projects focusing on priority topics. Predictive (criterion-related) validity was sought by analyzing five successively more stringent levels of evidence: 1) feasibility of i…
Priority Setting in Quality Assurance
A structured procedure using the judgments of a representative group of local providers for establishing priorities for quality assurance activity in diverse medical institutions was tested for reliability. Two independent matched teams of phy sicians, nurses, administrators, and other staff in eight separate medical facilities generated 320 topics which encompassed areas where quality assurance efforts would have either considerable or little im…
No prominent works on this page.
Priority Setting in Quality Assurance
A structured procedure using the judgments of a representative group of local providers for establishing priorities for quality assurance activity in diverse medical institutions was tested for reliability. Two independent matched teams of phy sicians, nurses, administrators, and other staff in eight separate medical facilities generated 320 topics which encompassed areas where quality assurance efforts would have either considerable or little im…
Assessing depression outcomes in group practice clinics
The application of a protocol for the initial assessment of medical care outcomes of geriatric depression management in four multispecialty group practice clinics is described. The clinical findings of this study are limited, but the protocol for the assessment of depression outcomes was found to be feasible, practical and acceptable in all four clinics. The success of the study has positive implications both for improving management of depressed…
Validity of Medical Staff Judgments in Establishing Quality Assurance Priorities
The validation of a structured group judgment procedure to establish priorities for quality assurance activities was undertaken in six medical institutions in the United States. Validation focused on the extent to which health improvement could be documented by outcome-based projects focusing on priority topics. Predictive (criterion-related) validity was sought by analyzing five successively more stringent levels of evidence: 1) feasibility of i…
Medicine (3 works) · Quality assurance (3 works) · Health care (2 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 works) · Healthcare Quality and Management (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Quality (philosophy) (2 works) · Alternative medicine (1 work) · Business (1 work)