Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Irit Samet

Biographic Data

ID5578666
NAMEIrit Samet
GIVEN NAMESIrit
FAMILY NAMESamet
SIGNATURESAMET I
AFFILIATIONSKing's College London
ORCID0000-0002-3140-541X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2007
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0
  • On Trusts, Hypocrisy and Conscience

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•The Cambridge Law Journal•2024

    In this paper, I suggest that taking seriously the way in which the trust is founded on a duty of conscience has far-reaching ramifications for the appropriate attitude towards new forms of trusts that are designed to allow people to enjoy the benefits of ownership without incurring the duties that come with it. The morally freighted concept of conscience that lies at the heart of trust law means that every claim against trustees invokes a demand…

  • The Beneficiary's Ownership Rights in the Trust Res in a Liberal Property Regime

    Open Access•Hanoch Dagan, Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2023

    This article argues that a liberal theory of property rights can help us resolve a century old debate about a foundational aspect of the trust, namely, the nature of the beneficiary's interest. According to orthodoxy, the beneficiary has a (weak form) of proprietary right to the trust res . But proponents of this view found it hard to defend it from attacks by Maitland and his successors who argue that central aspects of the beneficiary's right i…

  • Proprietary Estoppel and Responsibility for Omissions

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2015•References: 29

    The ‘acquiescence’ category of proprietary estoppel is a rare example of responsibility for pure omissions in private law. On liberal‐individualistic theories of ownership, the policy considerations against liability for nondoing are exceptionally powerful in the context of rights over land. Nevertheless, I argue that in proprietary estoppel the law is justified in imposing a duty on the right‐holder to alert a stranger when his actions are based…

  • The Form of Evil

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2010

    Upon arriving in Auschwitz Primo Levi discovered that rational discourse, in which actions are done for reasons, was left lying on the carriage floor together with his human dignity. By responding ‘Here one doesn't ask why’, the camp guard succinctly conveys the insight that evil defies reason. This paper examines two studies of evil that are predicated on that idea: Kant's and Augustine's. It argues that their theories share an underlying format…

  • Satanic Motivations

    Open Access•Irit Samet, Irit Samet-Porat•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2007

No prominent works on this page.

  • Satanic Motivations

    Open Access•Irit Samet, Irit Samet-Porat•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2007

  • The Form of Evil

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2010

    Upon arriving in Auschwitz Primo Levi discovered that rational discourse, in which actions are done for reasons, was left lying on the carriage floor together with his human dignity. By responding ‘Here one doesn't ask why’, the camp guard succinctly conveys the insight that evil defies reason. This paper examines two studies of evil that are predicated on that idea: Kant's and Augustine's. It argues that their theories share an underlying format…

  • Proprietary Estoppel and Responsibility for Omissions

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2015•References: 29

    The ‘acquiescence’ category of proprietary estoppel is a rare example of responsibility for pure omissions in private law. On liberal‐individualistic theories of ownership, the policy considerations against liability for nondoing are exceptionally powerful in the context of rights over land. Nevertheless, I argue that in proprietary estoppel the law is justified in imposing a duty on the right‐holder to alert a stranger when his actions are based…

  • The Beneficiary's Ownership Rights in the Trust Res in a Liberal Property Regime

    Open Access•Hanoch Dagan, Irit Samet•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2023

    This article argues that a liberal theory of property rights can help us resolve a century old debate about a foundational aspect of the trust, namely, the nature of the beneficiary's interest. According to orthodoxy, the beneficiary has a (weak form) of proprietary right to the trust res . But proponents of this view found it hard to defend it from attacks by Maitland and his successors who argue that central aspects of the beneficiary's right i…

  • On Trusts, Hypocrisy and Conscience

    Open Access•Irit Samet•ARTICLE•The Cambridge Law Journal•2024

    In this paper, I suggest that taking seriously the way in which the trust is founded on a duty of conscience has far-reaching ramifications for the appropriate attitude towards new forms of trusts that are designed to allow people to enjoy the benefits of ownership without incurring the duties that come with it. The morally freighted concept of conscience that lies at the heart of trust law means that every claim against trustees invokes a demand…

Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Legal principles and applications (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Property (philosophy) (2 works) · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae